Gujarat High Court
Administrative and Public LawConstitutional Law

A no-confidence motion against a Sarpanch cannot be moved within one year of election.

PRAJAPTI KANTILAL HIRABHAI vs DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MEHSANA

Gujarat High CourtJUDGMENT: October 12, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
A no-confidence motion against a Sarpanch cannot be moved within one year of election.. PRAJAPTI KANTILAL HIRABHAI vs DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MEHSANA. Gujarat High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner was elected Sarpanch of Kuvasana Gram Panchayat on 22 June 2025. On 8 May 2026, the Vice-Sarpanch and five other members moved a no-confidence motion against him. A special meeting was held on 1 June 2026, at which six members voted in favour of the motion; the resolution removing the petitioner was challenged in this writ petition.

Source reference: paras. 3.1–3.5, pp. 2–3

The petitioner contended that the motion was moved before completion of one year from his election, contrary to the principle stated in Shivangiben Chetankumar Patel v. State of Gujarat.

Source reference: para. 5, p. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether a no-confidence motion against an elected Sarpanch may be moved within one year of the Sarpanch’s election

Source reference: paras. 5, 7–8, pp. 4–5

2. Whether the resolution removing the petitioner, passed pursuant to a motion moved within that period, could be sustained

Source reference: paras. 7–9, pp. 5–6
03

Law Applied

Section 56 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 provides for a no-confidence motion but, as described by the Court, does not prescribe a specific time restriction for moving one.

Source reference: para. 8, p. 5

In Shivangiben Chetankumar Patel v. State of Gujarat, Letters Patent Appeal No. 543 of 2017, decided 9 May 2018, the Division Bench held that, having regard to Section 13 of the Act, the executive functions of a Sarpanch under Section 55, and the object of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, a reasonable period of one year should elapse from the date of declaration of the election result before a no-confidence motion against a Sarpanch may be moved.

Source reference: para. 8, pp. 5–6
04

Reasoning

The petitioner had been elected on 22 June 2025, while the motion was moved on 8 May 2026—within one year. The Court applied the one-year reasonable-period principle in Shivangiben Patel and noted that the respondents did not controvert that legal proposition.

Source reference: paras. 7–9, pp. 5–6

Since the motion was moved before the one-year period had elapsed, the resulting resolution removing the petitioner could not be sustained.

Source reference: paras. 7–9, pp. 5–6
05

Holding

The Court held that the no-confidence motion was moved within one year of the petitioner’s election.

The Court set aside both the notice dated 8 May 2026 and Resolution No. 11 passed at the meeting on 1 June 2026. The petition was allowed, with no order as to costs.

Source reference: para. 10, p. 7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

3 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Gujarat Panchayats Act, 19933

Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

PRAJAPTI KANTILAL HIRABHAIvsDISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MEHSANA

Gujarat High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment