Facts
GD Goenka Pvt Ltd filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator for disputes arising from an Intellectual Property License Agreement and an Education Services Agreement, both dated 8 September 2020
Source reference: p. 1The agreements contained arbitration clauses, with the IP License Agreement providing for a sole arbitrator and the ESA providing for a three-member tribunal
Source reference: pp. 2–3The parties agreed to first attempt mediation and, if it failed, to refer the disputes to arbitration; they did not dispute the existence of a valid arbitration agreement
Source reference: pp. 1–2Issues
Whether the disputes should first be referred to mediation, as the parties agreed
Source reference: p. 1Whether the Court should appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Act where the parties accepted the existence of a valid arbitration agreement
Source reference: pp. 3–4Law Applied
Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court’s enquiry is confined to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement
Source reference: p. 4The arbitration clauses in the parties’ agreements provided for arbitration of unresolved disputes after a 30-business-day negotiation period; the IP License Agreement specified a sole arbitrator, while the ESA provided for a three-member tribunal
Source reference: pp. 2–3The order also required the appointed arbitrator to furnish the disclosure contemplated by Section 12(2) of the Act
Source reference: p. 4Reasoning
The parties were ad idem on referring the matter to mediation and, if settlement was unsuccessful, to arbitration; the Court recorded that there was no dispute about the existence of a valid arbitration agreement
Source reference: pp. 1–2Applying the limited Section 11 enquiry, the Court found no impediment to appointing an arbitrator
Source reference: p. 4It left questions including arbitrability, jurisdiction and limitation for determination by the arbitrator, and clarified that its observations would not affect the merits of the disputes
Source reference: pp. 4–5Holding
The Court referred the parties to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (Samadhan), directing them to appear on 6 October 2026 and allowing three weeks to explore settlement
If mediation failed, Mr. Abhay Sahai, Advocate, was appointed Sole Arbitrator, to enter upon the reference within three weeks of the mediation report recording failure
Source reference: p. 4The arbitration is to proceed under the aegis of DIAC, with fees as per its Schedule of Fees; the petition was disposed of accordingly
Source reference: pp. 4–5Acts & Sections Cited
2 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19962
Original Court PDF
Gd Goenka Pvt LtdvsGn Education Society & Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
