Madras High Court
Criminal LawAdministrative and Public Law

A prior acquittal supports emergency leave without police escort, subject to police reporting conditions.

Divya vs The Deputy Inspector General

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: October 01, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
A prior acquittal supports emergency leave without police escort, subject to police reporting conditions.. Divya vs The Deputy Inspector General. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Divya, sister of life convict Vijay @ Muniyandi, sought six days’ emergency leave without police escort so her brother could assist with arrangements for her cancer treatment.

Source reference: pp. 2–4

The prison authorities granted leave but required police escort.

Source reference: pp. 2–4

The State opposed leave without escort, relying on a housebreaking case registered against the prisoner during an earlier unescorted leave; he was subsequently acquitted.

Source reference: pp. 2–4

The petitioner also stated that her brother would report to the police twice daily.

Source reference: pp. 2–4
02

Issues

Whether the condition requiring police escort during the prisoner’s six-day emergency leave should be modified to permit leave without escort.

Source reference: pp. 2–4

Whether conditions for monitoring and compliance should be imposed during the unescorted leave.

Source reference: p. 4
03

Law Applied

The judgment identifies no specific statutory provision or precedent as the basis for its decision.

Source reference: pp. 4–5

It considered the circumstances supporting emergency leave, including the petitioner’s medical need and the prisoner’s acquittal in the case arising from his earlier leave.

Source reference: pp. 4–5

The Court directed compliance with the conditions prescribed in the Jail Manual and imposed additional reporting and return requirements.

Source reference: pp. 4–5
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the petitioner’s need for treatment for cancer and noted that, although the prisoner had been alleged to have committed a housebreaking offence while on earlier unescorted leave, he had been acquitted.

Source reference: pp. 4–5

In those circumstances, it directed that the leave be granted without escort.

Source reference: pp. 4–5

To address supervision concerns, it required the prisoner to report to the Thuvakkudi Police Station twice daily and to return to prison when the leave ended.

Source reference: pp. 4–5
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the respondents to grant the prisoner six days’ emergency leave without escort.

During the leave, he must report to the Inspector of Police, Thuvakkudi Police Station, at 10:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. daily, return to prison upon completion of the leave, comply with the Jail Manual, and use the leave only for the purpose for which it was granted.

Source reference: pp. 4–5

The petitioner must provide the necessary documents and a copy of the order to the prison authorities.

Source reference: pp. 4–5

No costs were awarded.

Source reference: pp. 4–5
06

Acts & Sections Cited

3 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20233

Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

DivyavsThe Deputy Inspector General

Madras High Court · October 01, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment