Delhi High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

A spouse’s impending surgery may justify short-term interim bail on humanitarian grounds.

Jitesh @ Jitu vs State Nct Of Delhi

Delhi High CourtJUDGMENT: October 14, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
A spouse’s impending surgery may justify short-term interim bail on humanitarian grounds.. Jitesh @ Jitu vs State Nct Of Delhi. Delhi High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner sought interim bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”), in FIR No. 5/2025, registered under Sections 21, 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (“NDPS Act”).

Source reference: paras. 1–3

The trial was pending at the prosecution-evidence stage, and the Special Judge had dismissed the petitioner’s interim-bail application.

Source reference: paras. 1–3

The petitioner submitted that his wife was suffering from a surgical-site infection arising from Pilonidal Sinus and was scheduled to undergo surgery on 16 October 2026; he sought release to assist her during treatment and recovery.

Source reference: paras. 4–7

The State verified the medical documents and the scheduled surgery, but opposed a 30-day release.

Source reference: paras. 8–10
02

Issues

Whether the petitioner should be granted interim bail on humanitarian and medical grounds to assist his wife in connection with her upcoming surgery and recovery.

Source reference: paras. 4–7, 10–11

If interim bail is granted, what duration and conditions should govern the petitioner’s release.

Source reference: para. 12
03

Law Applied

The petitioner invoked Section 483 of the BNSS, the provision under which the application for bail was brought before the High Court.

Source reference: para. 1

The underlying prosecution concerned alleged offences under Sections 21, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act.

Source reference: para. 1

The judgment does not cite any precedent or articulate a general test for interim bail on medical or humanitarian grounds; it records that relief was considered in light of the verified medical circumstances and the interests of justice.

Source reference: paras. 10–11
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the wife’s medical condition, the upcoming surgery and the State’s verification of the supporting documents.

Source reference: paras. 9–12

In view of those verified circumstances and the interests of justice, it allowed interim release, while limiting the period to ten days rather than the thirty days sought by the petitioner.

Source reference: paras. 9–12

It imposed conditions addressing the petitioner’s conduct, residence, contact details, travel, non-interference with evidence and surrender; it also required him to provide the surgery-related documents upon surrender.

Source reference: para. 12
05

Holding

The Court allowed the petition and granted the petitioner interim bail for ten days from the date of release, subject to a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety in the like amount and the specified conditions.

The petitioner was required to surrender by 4:00 p.m. upon expiry of the bail period; the order also provided for surrender on 17 October 2026 by 4:00 p.m. if the surgery did not take place on or before 16 October 2026.

Source reference: paras. 12.7–12.9

The Court directed that a copy of the order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for compliance.

Source reference: para. 14
06

Acts & Sections Cited

4 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 19853

Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

Jitesh @ JituvsState Nct Of Delhi

Delhi High Court · October 14, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment