Facts
The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered for offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
Source reference: para. 1The prosecution alleged that the applicant and co-accused Dhalendra took the deceased, Praveen, to Kharga Talab, where the deceased was assaulted and drowned; the body was later recovered from the pond following Dhalendra’s disclosure
Source reference: para. 2The applicant argued that his implication rested on the co-accused’s statement, that no incriminating article was recovered at his instance, and that the forensic evidence did not establish a DNA match
Source reference: para. 3The State relied, among other things, on seizure of the motorcycle allegedly used to transport the deceased and CCTV footage collected during investigation
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS in light of the allegations and material collected during investigation
Source reference: paras. 1, 5–8Whether the absence of a DNA match and the applicant’s objections to the evidence justified bail at this stage
Source reference: paras. 3, 7–8Law Applied
Section 483 of the BNSS provides the basis for the application for regular bail
Source reference: para. 1The Court stated that, at the bail stage, its role is confined to verifying whether a prima facie case exists
Source reference: para. 6The alleged offences were under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 238 of the BNS
Source reference: para. 1Reasoning
The Court found specific allegations of the applicant’s participation in the murder and considered the seized motorcycle, CCTV footage and recovery of the deceased’s body following the co-accused’s disclosure as material relevant to the prima facie assessment
Source reference: paras. 6–8It held that the FSL report’s failure to establish a DNA match could not be considered in isolation and that the evidentiary value of the report was for the trial court to assess
Source reference: para. 7On the material before it, the Court was not inclined to grant bail
Source reference: para. 8Holding
The Court rejected the applicant’s first application for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS
The absence of a DNA match did not, at this stage, outweigh the other material relied upon in support of the prosecution case
Source reference: paras. 7–9Acts & Sections Cited
4 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20233
Original Court PDF
VAIBHAV SONIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
