Facts
The applicants were arrested on 17.12.2025 in connection with Crime No./P.O.R.No. 21614/13
Source reference: para 1, 3On 16.12.2025, a forest constable discovered two dead bisons in Forest Range No. 47
Source reference: para 2The prosecution alleged that the applicants had illegally laid G.I. wires in the forest, resulting in the electrocution and death of the animals
Source reference: para 2The applicants moved the High Court for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, arguing that they were falsely implicated based on suspicion, that no illegal articles were recovered from them, and that there were no eyewitnesses to the incident
Source reference: para 3Issues
Whether the applicants are entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, considering the nature of the evidence and the period of their judicial custody
Source reference: para 1, 6Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which provides the High Court with the power to grant bail
Source reference: para 1Substantive offences were registered under Section 9 read with Sections 2, 20, 32, 39, 44(B), 50, and 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, concerning the illegal hunting and protection of wildlife
Source reference: para 1Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984
Source reference: para 1Procedural conditions for bail were framed with reference to Section 269 (non-attendance), Section 84 (proclamation for person absconding), Section 209 (failure to appear), and Section 351 (evidence in presence of accused) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and BNSS
Source reference: para 7Reasoning
The Court evaluated the facts and circumstances, specifically noting that the investigation was largely complete as the charge-sheet had already been filed
Source reference: para 4, 6The Court observed that the applicants had no previous criminal antecedents and had been in continuous judicial custody since 17.12.2025
Source reference: para 6It further noted that the conclusion of the trial would likely take considerable time
Source reference: para 6Relying on the fact that the case is triable by a Magistrate and the applicants are permanent residents with no apparent risk of absconding, the Court found that the gravity of the allegations was balanced by the procedural status and the period of incarceration already undergone
Source reference: para 3, 6Holding
The Court allowed the bail application and directed the release of both applicants on furnishing personal bonds with two local sureties each
The holding is subject to strict conditions: the applicants must not seek unnecessary adjournments, must remain present for all trial dates (subject to Section 269 BNS), and must appear specifically for the opening of the case, framing of charges, and recording of statements under Section 351 of BNSS
Source reference: para 7Failure to comply with bail conditions or proclamations under Section 84 of BNSS will authorize the trial court to initiate proceedings under Section 209 of the BNS
Source reference: para 7Original Court PDF
KUNWAR SINGHvsTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in