Madhya Pradesh High Court

Absence of force or inducement in victim's statement warrants bail in romantic relationship-based POCSO cases.

Mukesh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 07, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Mukesh (aged 20), was arrested on January 6, 2026, in connection with Crime No. 530/2025 at Police Station Khachrod.

Source reference: p. 1

He is accused of kidnapping a minor victim (aged 17 years and 4 months) and committing penetrative sexual assault.

Source reference: p. 2

The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual and romantic, stating the victim left her home voluntarily due to family opposition.

Source reference: p. 2

In her statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, 2023, the victim admitted she called the applicant, accompanied him to Mhow, and engaged in physical relations.

Source reference: p. 2

The final report has been filed, and the applicant has no prior criminal record.

Source reference: p. 2
02

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, considering the nature of the allegations and the victim's statement.

Source reference: p. 1-2
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, regarding the High Court's power to grant bail.

Source reference: p. 1

Sections 137(2) (Kidnapping) and 64(2) (Punishment for rape) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, alongside Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

Source reference: p. 1

The procedural requirements for witness examination under Section 346 of the BNSS (formerly Section 309 of the Cr.P.C.).

Source reference: p. 3
04

Reasoning

The court observed that the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS lacked evidence of inducement, enticement, or force, suggesting a prima facie merit in the applicant’s claim of a romantic relationship.

Source reference: p. 2

While the prosecution opposed bail based on the gravity of the offense, the court noted that the applicant is a 20-year-old agricultural laborer with no criminal antecedents and deep family roots, reducing the risk of fleeing from justice or recidivism.

Source reference: p. 2

The court emphasized that the determination of the victim's exact age and the veracity of the prosecution's claims are matters for trial, and continued incarceration of the young applicant was deemed unnecessary given the socio-economic context and the filing of the final report.

Source reference: p. 2
05

Holding

The Court allowed the application and directed the release of the applicant on bail.

The applicant is required to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of the same amount.

Source reference: p. 2

The bail is subject to several conditions, including regular attendance at trial hearings, a prohibition on committing similar offenses, and a strict injunction against tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.

Source reference: p. 3

The Court clarified that these observations are limited to the bail application and do not reflect on the merits of the final trial.

Source reference: p. 2
Madhya Pradesh High Court

Original Court PDF

MukeshvsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · April 07, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment