Facts
The applicant, Mukesh (aged 20), was arrested on January 6, 2026, in connection with Crime No. 530/2025 at Police Station Khachrod.
Source reference: p. 1He is accused of kidnapping a minor victim (aged 17 years and 4 months) and committing penetrative sexual assault.
Source reference: p. 2The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual and romantic, stating the victim left her home voluntarily due to family opposition.
Source reference: p. 2In her statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, 2023, the victim admitted she called the applicant, accompanied him to Mhow, and engaged in physical relations.
Source reference: p. 2The final report has been filed, and the applicant has no prior criminal record.
Source reference: p. 2Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, considering the nature of the allegations and the victim's statement.
Source reference: p. 1-2Law Applied
Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, regarding the High Court's power to grant bail.
Source reference: p. 1Sections 137(2) (Kidnapping) and 64(2) (Punishment for rape) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, alongside Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
Source reference: p. 1The procedural requirements for witness examination under Section 346 of the BNSS (formerly Section 309 of the Cr.P.C.).
Source reference: p. 3Reasoning
The court observed that the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS lacked evidence of inducement, enticement, or force, suggesting a prima facie merit in the applicant’s claim of a romantic relationship.
Source reference: p. 2While the prosecution opposed bail based on the gravity of the offense, the court noted that the applicant is a 20-year-old agricultural laborer with no criminal antecedents and deep family roots, reducing the risk of fleeing from justice or recidivism.
Source reference: p. 2The court emphasized that the determination of the victim's exact age and the veracity of the prosecution's claims are matters for trial, and continued incarceration of the young applicant was deemed unnecessary given the socio-economic context and the filing of the final report.
Source reference: p. 2Holding
The Court allowed the application and directed the release of the applicant on bail.
The applicant is required to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of the same amount.
Source reference: p. 2The bail is subject to several conditions, including regular attendance at trial hearings, a prohibition on committing similar offenses, and a strict injunction against tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.
Source reference: p. 3The Court clarified that these observations are limited to the bail application and do not reflect on the merits of the final trial.
Source reference: p. 2Original Court PDF
MukeshvsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in