Facts
The appellant was convicted by the Trial Court on 11/10/1995 for offences under Sections 120-B, 302/34, and 364 of the IPC.
Source reference: para. 1, 5The prosecution alleged that on 24/05/1985, the appellant and co-accused lured the deceased, Raju Soni, from his house on a motorcycle.
Source reference: para. 2It was alleged they conspired to tie him up, transport him to a forest, and kill him by fire.
Source reference: para. 3Fifty-three days after the disappearance, a skeleton was recovered based on a Section 27 Evidence Act statement by a co-accused.
Source reference: para. 4The appellant challenged the conviction on grounds that the death was not proved to be homicidal, "last seen" evidence was fractured, and there was no evidence of forcible abduction.
Source reference: para. 7-10Issues
1. Whether the voluntary accompaniment of the accused by the deceased constitutes "abduction" under Section 364 of the IPC.
Source reference: para. 8-9Acts & Sections Cited
8 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Indian Penal Code, 18605
Code of Criminal Procedure, 19733
Original Court PDF
Assu @ Ashok Kumar v. The State of Madhya Pradesh [2026:MPHC-JBP:19172]
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![Absence of Proof for Homicidal Death and Incomplete Chain of Circumstances Vitiate Conviction Based on Last Seen Theory.. Assu @ Ashok Kumar v. The State of Madhya Pradesh [2026:MPHC-JBP:19172]. Madhya Pradesh High Court. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/absence-of-proof-for-homicidal-death-and-incomplete-chain-of-circumstances-vitiate-convict-6707055e46654fcdbd41d3acbd8a770f.webp)