Chhattisgarh High Court
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Absorbed employees’ seniority runs from the date the Government took over the college.

DR. RAVI SHARMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: September 26, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Absorbed employees’ seniority runs from the date the Government took over the college.. DR. RAVI SHARMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners, Assistant Professors at Sant Gobindram Shadani Government Arts and Commerce Girls College, Raipur, were amalgamated or absorbed into Government service on 5 October 2018 without a break in service.

Source reference: para. 1–2, 5

The College had been taken over by the State Government with effect from 21 December 2012.

Source reference: para. 1–2, 5

The petitioners claimed that, under Rule 14(v) of the Chhattisgarh Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Recruitment Rules, 1990, their seniority should run from the takeover date rather than the date of absorption.

Source reference: para. 2, 5

They sought correction of their seniority and consideration for promotion, and stated that their representations remained undecided.

Source reference: para. 1–2, 5
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioners’ seniority as absorbed employees should be determined from the date the College was taken over by the Government, rather than from their later absorption into Government service.

Source reference: para. 2, 5

2. Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the petitioners’ representations and decide their seniority claim by a reasoned order.

Source reference: para. 1, 3, 6
03

Law Applied

Rule 14(v) of the Chhattisgarh Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Recruitment Rules, 1990, as amended by Gazette Notification dated 13 June 2013, provides that the seniority of an absorbed employee is to be determined from the date on which the College was taken over by the Government.

Source reference: para. 5

The Court recorded that the College’s takeover took effect on 21 December 2012 under the Government Order dated 24 September 2013.

Source reference: para. 5
04

Reasoning

The Court noted that the petitioners’ uninterrupted service, their absorption in 2018, the College’s takeover in 2012, and the applicability of Rule 14(v) were undisputed.

Source reference: para. 5

However, rather than itself determining the petitioners’ seniority or granting consequential promotion-related relief, the Court directed them to submit a representation citing the relevant rules and required the competent authorities to decide it in accordance with the 1990 Rules.

Source reference: para. 3, 6
05

Holding

The petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit a representation to Respondents 1 and 2 within 20 days.

The respondents were directed to consider the representation under the 1990 Rules and pass a reasoned and speaking order within 40 days of its receipt.

Source reference: para. 6–7

The Court did not itself finally determine the petitioners’ seniority or order promotion or consequential benefits.

Source reference: para. 6–7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

DR. RAVI SHARMAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · September 26, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment