Facts
The petitioners, Assistant Professors at Sant Gobindram Shadani Government Arts and Commerce Girls College, Raipur, were amalgamated or absorbed into Government service on 5 October 2018 without a break in service.
Source reference: para. 1–2, 5The College had been taken over by the State Government with effect from 21 December 2012.
Source reference: para. 1–2, 5The petitioners claimed that, under Rule 14(v) of the Chhattisgarh Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Recruitment Rules, 1990, their seniority should run from the takeover date rather than the date of absorption.
Source reference: para. 2, 5They sought correction of their seniority and consideration for promotion, and stated that their representations remained undecided.
Source reference: para. 1–2, 5Issues
1. Whether the petitioners’ seniority as absorbed employees should be determined from the date the College was taken over by the Government, rather than from their later absorption into Government service.
Source reference: para. 2, 52. Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the petitioners’ representations and decide their seniority claim by a reasoned order.
Source reference: para. 1, 3, 6Law Applied
Rule 14(v) of the Chhattisgarh Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Recruitment Rules, 1990, as amended by Gazette Notification dated 13 June 2013, provides that the seniority of an absorbed employee is to be determined from the date on which the College was taken over by the Government.
Source reference: para. 5The Court recorded that the College’s takeover took effect on 21 December 2012 under the Government Order dated 24 September 2013.
Source reference: para. 5Reasoning
The Court noted that the petitioners’ uninterrupted service, their absorption in 2018, the College’s takeover in 2012, and the applicability of Rule 14(v) were undisputed.
Source reference: para. 5However, rather than itself determining the petitioners’ seniority or granting consequential promotion-related relief, the Court directed them to submit a representation citing the relevant rules and required the competent authorities to decide it in accordance with the 1990 Rules.
Source reference: para. 3, 6Holding
The petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit a representation to Respondents 1 and 2 within 20 days.
The respondents were directed to consider the representation under the 1990 Rules and pass a reasoned and speaking order within 40 days of its receipt.
Source reference: para. 6–7The Court did not itself finally determine the petitioners’ seniority or order promotion or consequential benefits.
Source reference: para. 6–7Original Court PDF
DR. RAVI SHARMAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
