Punjab and Haryana High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

After 58-Year-Old Cyclist’s Death, P&H HC Raises Widow And Son’s Compensation To Rs 8.22 Lakh, Adding 10% Future Prospects And Consortium For Both

Vidya Devi And Anotherv.Ranjit Singh And Others

After 58-Year-Old Cyclist’s Death, P&H HC Raises Widow And Son’s Compensation To Rs 8.22 Lakh, Adding 10% Future Prospects And Consortium For Both. Vidya Devi And Another vs Ranjit Singh And Others. Punjab and Haryana High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether an addition for future prospects should be made to the deceased’s assessed income when calculating loss of dependency.

The court held

The appeal was allowed. The Court modified the Tribunal’s award and determined total compensation at ₹8,22,800, inclusive of the amount already awarded, with interest at 7.5% per annum.

It also directed

The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation within two months, and the Tribunal was directed to disburse it in accordance with its apportionment.

01Facts

Ram Kumar died after a Mahindra XUV struck his bicycle on 16 August 2019. His widow and son brought a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

¶ 2

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded them ₹7,18,000, with interest at 7.5% per annum. They appealed, seeking enhancement on the grounds that future prospects had not been included, consortium had been awarded only once, and funeral expenses were inadequate.

¶ 2–6

The deceased was 58½ years old and his income was assessed at ₹9,000 per month, based on minimum wages.

¶ 13

02Issues

i.1. Whether an addition for future prospects should be made to the deceased’s assessed income when calculating loss of dependency.

¶ 6, 9–10

ii.2. Whether both claimants were entitled to compensation for loss of consortium.

¶ 6, 11

iii.3. Whether the Tribunal’s award for funeral expenses required enhancement.

¶ 6, 12

03Law Applied

The claim was brought under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

¶ 2

Under National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, 2017 (4) RCR (Civil) 1009, future prospects must be added to the deceased’s established income; for a self-employed person or one on a fixed salary aged 50–60, the addition is 10%.

¶ 9

Under Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram, Civil Appeal No. 9581 of 2018, consortium includes spousal, parental and filial consortium, and eligible family members may receive compensation under that head.

¶ 11

Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 279Section 427

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

04Reasoning

Applying Pranay Sethi, the Court added 10% to the deceased’s annual income of ₹1,08,000, deducted one-third for personal expenses, and applied a multiplier of 9, resulting in loss of dependency of ₹7,12,800.

¶ 10, 13

Applying Magma General, it awarded ₹40,000 to each claimant for loss of consortium, totalling ₹80,000.

¶ 11, 13

It found the existing award for funeral expenses adequate and made no enhancement under that head.

¶ 12

05Holding

The appeal was allowed. The Court modified the Tribunal’s award and determined total compensation at ₹8,22,800, inclusive of the amount already awarded, with interest at 7.5% per annum.

¶ 13–17

The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation within two months, and the Tribunal was directed to disburse it in accordance with its apportionment.

¶ 13–17
Punjab and Haryana High Court

Original Court PDF

Vidya Devi And AnothervsRanjit Singh And Others

Punjab and Haryana High Court · November 13, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment