Gujarat High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

After 76-Day Hospitalisation And 53% Disability, Gujarat HC Adds Rs 2.04 Lakh To Injured Pillion Rider’s Compensation

SHARDABEN W/O NAVINCHANDRA PATEL AND D/O KALIDAS LALABHAI PATELv.MAHESH SITARAM CHAUHAN (DELETED)

After 76-Day Hospitalisation And 53% Disability, Gujarat HC Adds Rs 2.04 Lakh To Injured Pillion Rider’s Compensation. SHARDABEN W/O NAVINCHANDRA PATEL  AND D/O KALIDAS LALABHAI PATEL vs MAHESH SITARAM CHAUHAN (DELETED). Gujarat High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the compensation awarded for pain, shock and suffering was adequate in light of the appellant’s injuries, surgery and 76-day hospitalisation.

The court held

The appeal was allowed to the extent of enhancement. The appellant was awarded an additional Rs. 2,04,976, with interest at 9% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realisation.

It also directed

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within eight weeks, for disbursement to the appellant through NEFT/RTGS after verification.

01Facts

On 30 July 2009, the appellant was injured while riding as a pillion passenger in a motorcycle–truck collision. She sustained multiple fractures and suffered 53% permanent disability; the Tribunal assessed compensation at Rs. 8,81,600.

¶ 1–2

On her appeal, she challenged the amounts awarded for pain, shock and suffering and sought compensation for loss of amenities. The insurer had not appealed the award for loss of future earnings.

¶ 3–6

02Issues

i.1. Whether the compensation awarded for pain, shock and suffering was adequate in light of the appellant’s injuries, surgery and 76-day hospitalisation.

¶ 4, 6–8

ii.2. Whether the appellant was entitled to compensation for loss of amenities, given her 53% permanent disability.

¶ 4, 6, 9

03Law Applied

The judgment cites no statute or precedent. It applies the compensatory principle that damages under relevant heads should reflect the claimant’s injuries, treatment and resulting disability.

¶ 5, 10–11

It also leaves undisturbed the accepted award for loss of future earnings and the Tribunal’s assessment of medical expenses.

¶ 5, 10–11

04Reasoning

The Court considered the appellant’s 76-day hospitalisation, surgical procedures and fractures to her tibia, fibula, pelvic rami and ribs, and found Rs. 25,000 inadequate for pain, shock and suffering; it enhanced that amount to Rs. 1,00,000.

¶ 8

In view of the same hospitalisation period, it increased the amount for special diet, attendant and transportation expenses from Rs. 20,000 to Rs. 50,000. Because the Tribunal had awarded nothing for loss of amenities despite the appellant’s 53% permanent disability, the Court awarded Rs. 1,00,000 under that head. It affirmed the medical-expense award and did not reconsider loss of earnings.

¶ 8–11

05Holding

The appeal was allowed to the extent of enhancement. The appellant was awarded an additional Rs. 2,04,976, with interest at 9% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realisation.

¶ 12–14

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within eight weeks, for disbursement to the appellant through NEFT/RTGS after verification.

¶ 12–14
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

SHARDABEN W/O NAVINCHANDRA PATEL AND D/O KALIDAS LALABHAI PATELvsMAHESH SITARAM CHAUHAN (DELETED)

Gujarat High Court · November 03, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment