Chhattisgarh High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

After Accident Victim Dies Following 76 Days Of Treatment, Chhattisgarh HC Adds ₹21,500 To Compensation For Care Costs

AAKASH SINGH RAJPUTv.SURESH VERMA

After Accident Victim Dies Following 76 Days Of Treatment, Chhattisgarh HC Adds ₹21,500 To Compensation For Care Costs. AAKASH SINGH RAJPUT vs SURESH VERMA. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the 344-day delay in filing the claimants’ appeal should be condoned.

The court held

The Court condoned the 344-day delay and partly allowed the appeal.

It also directed

It awarded an additional ₹21,500, bringing the total compensation to ₹55,30,600.

The enhanced amount carries interest at 6% per annum from 16 February 2024, the date the appeal was filed, until realization; the remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award remain unchanged.

The Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimants in Hindi and may enlist the assistance of paralegal workers in coordination with the concerned area’s Secretary, Legal Aid.

01Facts

The appellants, the deceased’s sons, sought enhancement of compensation awarded for the death of their father, Trilok Singh Thakur, who died on 20 May 2018, 76 days after a road accident on 3 March 2018.

¶ 2–8

The Claims Tribunal awarded total compensation of ₹55,09,100, including ₹13,500 for attendant charges, ₹10,000 for special diet, and ₹5,000 for transportation. The appellants challenged the adequacy of those three amounts.

¶ 2–8

The High Court first condoned a 344-day delay in filing the appeal and then heard the appeal finally.

¶ 2–8

02Issues

i.Whether the 344-day delay in filing the claimants’ appeal should be condoned.

¶ 4

ii.Whether the amounts awarded for attendant charges, special diet, and transportation were inadequate in light of the deceased’s 76-day treatment period.

¶ 9, 12

03Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of a Claims Tribunal.

¶ 8

The Court applied the principle that compensation under relevant heads must be just and reasonable in light of the evidence and circumstances, including the duration of treatment.

¶ 12

The judgment cites no specific precedent or further statutory provision governing the assessment of these expenses.

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The deceased remained under treatment for 76 days before succumbing to his injuries.

¶ 12

Although the Tribunal considered the medical bills and awarded ₹5,60,000 for medical expenses, the High Court found the combined ₹28,500 awarded for attendant charges, special diet, and transportation to be on the low side given the duration of treatment.

¶ 12

It considered ₹50,000 in total under those heads just and reasonable, resulting in an additional award of ₹21,500.

¶ 12

05Holding

The Court condoned the 344-day delay and partly allowed the appeal.

¶ 4, 13

It awarded an additional ₹21,500, bringing the total compensation to ₹55,30,600.

¶ 13

The enhanced amount carries interest at 6% per annum from 16 February 2024, the date the appeal was filed, until realization; the remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award remain unchanged.

¶ 13

The Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimants in Hindi and may enlist the assistance of paralegal workers in coordination with the concerned area’s Secretary, Legal Aid.

¶ 14
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

AAKASH SINGH RAJPUTvsSURESH VERMA

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 26, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment