01Facts
Ankit died by suicide on 15 April 2026 after setting himself on fire. Before his death, he recorded two videos naming the petitioners.
pp. 2–3His sister’s complaint alleged that Kajal, with Dilbag and another person, had threatened and harassed Ankit, including by threatening false criminal proceedings and demanding money.
pp. 2–3An FIR was registered under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).
pp. 2–3The petitioners sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). They joined the investigation under interim orders of the Court; the State and complainant opposed making those orders absolute.
pp. 4–702Issues
i.Whether the petitioners should be granted anticipatory bail in the investigation into Ankit’s suicide
pp. 6–8ii.Whether, at the anticipatory-bail stage, the allegations and materials warranted custodial interrogation or otherwise justified refusing the petitioners’ applications
pp. 7–1003Law Applied
Section 482 BNSS empowers the Court to grant anticipatory bail, subject to the statutory conditions in Section 482(2) BNSS.
pp. 4–5, 9The alleged offence was under Section 108 BNS, with Section 3(5) BNS also invoked in the FIR.
p. 1In considering anticipatory bail, the Court referred to Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab and Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) as addressing the relevant considerations, and to Deepak Aggarwal v. Balwani Singh as providing guidance on anticipatory-bail decisions.
pp. 8–9The Court emphasised that the assessment is case-specific and that it was not appropriate, at this stage, to lay down broader parameters for abetment of suicide or decide the merits.
p. 9Provisions in the judgment · 4 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 108Section 3
Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 306
04Reasoning
The Court considered the videos recorded by Ankit, their transcript, the WhatsApp chats, and the allegations in the FIR.
pp. 7–8It observed that the matter prima facie appeared to involve a relationship that had deteriorated, while leaving for trial whether the alleged threats to implicate Ankit and his sister in a criminal case amounted to abetment of suicide.
pp. 7–8The petitioners had joined the investigation, had clean antecedents, and no recovery was required from them. In those circumstances, the Court found that their custody would serve no useful purpose, without expressing an opinion on the merits.
p. 805Holding
The Court allowed both anticipatory-bail petitions
p. 9and made absolute its interim orders dated 10 August 2026 and 24 August 2026, subject to compliance with Section 482(2) BNSS.
p. 9Original Court PDF
Dilbag SinghvsState Of Haryana
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
