Madras High CourtEducation LawAdministrative and Public Law

After University Failed To Reconstitute Selection Panel, Madras HC Promotes Associate Professor To Professor From Judgment Date, Without Back Pay

T.SUMATHIv.THE VICE CHANCELLOR

After University Failed To Reconstitute Selection Panel, Madras HC Promotes Associate Professor To Professor From Judgment Date, Without Back Pay. T.SUMATHI vs THE VICE CHANCELLOR. Madras High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the University’s failure to implement the Single Judge’s direction to constitute a fresh Selection Committee warranted appellate intervention.

The court held

The Court disposed of both writ appeals and directed the University to confer Professorship on Dr. Sumathi with effect from 29 October 2026, without monetary benefits.

It also directed

The connected miscellaneous petitions were closed, with no order as to costs.

01Facts

Dr. T. Sumathi, an Associate Professor in the University of Madras’s Department of Medical Biochemistry, applied under the Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) for promotion to Professor. Although her application received satisfactory evaluation reports, the Selection Committee did not recommend her after the interview, and the Syndicate approved that decision.

p. 4

She challenged the non-selection before the High Court. The Single Judge quashed the relevant Syndicate action and Selection Committee minutes and directed the University to constitute a new committee with different experts to assess her candidature.

pp. 5–6

Both the University and Dr. Sumathi appealed, challenging the parts of the Single Judge’s order adverse to them.

p. 6

02Issues

i.1. Whether the University’s failure to implement the Single Judge’s direction to constitute a fresh Selection Committee warranted appellate intervention.

pp. 6–8

ii.2. Whether Dr. Sumathi should receive promotion to Professor, and from what date and with what consequential benefits, given the delay and the absence of an earlier committee recommendation.

p. 8

03Law Applied

The Court referred to the UGC Regulations governing promotion under the Career Advancement Scheme, including the requirement that a candidate’s suitability for promotion be assessed through the prescribed selection process; the judgment did not identify a specific regulation or statutory provision.

pp. 4–5

The Court also applied the principle that a University must diligently comply with a judicial direction requiring reconsideration by a properly constituted committee, while taking account of the candidate’s lack of recommendation by the earlier Selection Committee.

p. 8

No precedent was cited.

04Reasoning

The Court found that the University had not diligently implemented the Single Judge’s direction to constitute a fresh committee with new expert members, and had instead pursued an appeal, resulting in further delay.

p. 8

However, Dr. Sumathi had not secured a recommendation from the original Selection Committee, so the Court did not grant her retrospective promotion or the monetary benefits sought. To avoid prolonging the matter through another selection process, it directed that she be conferred Professorship from the date of the appellate order, without monetary benefits.

p. 8

05Holding

The Court disposed of both writ appeals and directed the University to confer Professorship on Dr. Sumathi with effect from 29 October 2026, without monetary benefits.

pp. 8–9

The connected miscellaneous petitions were closed, with no order as to costs.

pp. 8–9
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

T.SUMATHIvsTHE VICE CHANCELLOR

Madras High Court · October 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment