01Facts
Dr. T. Sumathi, an Associate Professor in the University of Madras’s Department of Medical Biochemistry, applied under the Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) for promotion to Professor. Although her application received satisfactory evaluation reports, the Selection Committee did not recommend her after the interview, and the Syndicate approved that decision.
p. 4She challenged the non-selection before the High Court. The Single Judge quashed the relevant Syndicate action and Selection Committee minutes and directed the University to constitute a new committee with different experts to assess her candidature.
pp. 5–6Both the University and Dr. Sumathi appealed, challenging the parts of the Single Judge’s order adverse to them.
p. 602Issues
i.1. Whether the University’s failure to implement the Single Judge’s direction to constitute a fresh Selection Committee warranted appellate intervention.
pp. 6–8ii.2. Whether Dr. Sumathi should receive promotion to Professor, and from what date and with what consequential benefits, given the delay and the absence of an earlier committee recommendation.
p. 803Law Applied
The Court referred to the UGC Regulations governing promotion under the Career Advancement Scheme, including the requirement that a candidate’s suitability for promotion be assessed through the prescribed selection process; the judgment did not identify a specific regulation or statutory provision.
pp. 4–5The Court also applied the principle that a University must diligently comply with a judicial direction requiring reconsideration by a properly constituted committee, while taking account of the candidate’s lack of recommendation by the earlier Selection Committee.
p. 8No precedent was cited.
04Reasoning
The Court found that the University had not diligently implemented the Single Judge’s direction to constitute a fresh committee with new expert members, and had instead pursued an appeal, resulting in further delay.
p. 8However, Dr. Sumathi had not secured a recommendation from the original Selection Committee, so the Court did not grant her retrospective promotion or the monetary benefits sought. To avoid prolonging the matter through another selection process, it directed that she be conferred Professorship from the date of the appellate order, without monetary benefits.
p. 805Holding
The Court disposed of both writ appeals and directed the University to confer Professorship on Dr. Sumathi with effect from 29 October 2026, without monetary benefits.
pp. 8–9The connected miscellaneous petitions were closed, with no order as to costs.
pp. 8–9Original Court PDF
T.SUMATHIvsTHE VICE CHANCELLOR
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
