Facts
The claimants filed an application under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, following a fatal motor accident involving the deceased, Sukhnath Ram, on 13.04.2018.
Source reference: p. 1, 4The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jashpur, awarded compensation of Rs. 6,94,599/- with interest on 30.08.2019.
Source reference: para. 1The Appellant (Insurer) challenged this award, contending that pursuant to the Central Government notification dated 22.05.2018, which amended the Second Schedule of the Act, the compensation for death under the structured formula is fixed at a flat rate of Rs. 5,00,000/-.
Source reference: para. 2, 4Issues
Whether the Notification dated 22.05.2018, which amended the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act to fix death compensation at Rs. 5,00,000/-, has retrospective effect on accidents occurring prior to the notification date.
Source reference: para. 7-8Law Applied
The Court applied Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for compensation on a structured formula basis without the requirement to prove fault.
Source reference: para. 5It specifically relied on the Notification dated 22.05.2018, which substituted the Second Schedule to fix compensation for fatal accidents at Rs. 5,00,000/- with a 5% annual increase effective from 01.01.2019.
Source reference: para. 6The Court followed the precedent established by the Supreme Court in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Urmila Halder (2024 SCC OnLine SC 498), which held that beneficial legislation regarding computational modalities applies to pending claims even if the accident preceded the amendment.
Source reference: para. 8Reasoning
The Court observed that while the accident occurred on 13.04.2018 and the amendment was notified on 22.05.2018, the Supreme Court's ruling in Urmila Halder clarifies that the amendment is a clarifying "computational mode" of beneficial legislation.
Source reference: para. 8Since there is no specific bar to its retrospective application, the benefit of the simplified structured formula must be passed to the claimants.
Source reference: para. 8The High Court determined that the Tribunal erred by not adhering to the amended Schedule, which caps the base compensation at Rs. 5,00,000/- for Section 163-A claims.
Source reference: para. 4, 9Additionally, the Court applied Paragraph 2 of the 2018 Notification, which mandates a 5% annual increase in the compensation amount starting from 01.01.2019.
Source reference: para. 9Calculating this increase over approximately eight years, the Court added Rs. 40,000/- to the base sum.
Source reference: para. 9Holding
The Court answered the issue in the affirmative, holding that the 2018 amendment applies to the claim.
The appeal was partly allowed, and the award was modified.
Source reference: para. 9, 11The total compensation was reduced from Rs. 6,94,599/- to Rs. 5,40,000/- (comprising the Rs. 5,00,000/- base and Rs. 40,000/- for annual increments).
Source reference: para. 9The claimants are entitled to 6% interest per annum from the date of the claim application (23.01.2019).
Source reference: para. 9The Appellant was directed to deposit the balance amount within 45 days.
Source reference: para. 10Original Court PDF
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDvsSMT. SEETAMUNI
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in