Facts
The appellants had filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging the decree dated 29 July 2021 in O.S. No. 140 of 2016.
Source reference: p. 5–6At the hearing, counsel reported that both appellants had died: the first appellant had died before the appeal was filed, and the second died on 19 September 2024.
Source reference: p. 5–6No steps had been taken to bring their legal representatives on record.
Source reference: p. 5–6Issues
1. Whether the appeal could proceed when both appellants had died and no steps had been taken to bring their legal representatives on record
Source reference: p. 62. Whether the appeal should be dismissed as abated in those circumstances
Source reference: p. 6Law Applied
The Court applied the procedural principle that an appeal abates when the deceased appellant’s legal representatives are not brought on record and the appeal cannot proceed in their absence.
Source reference: p. 5–6Although the appeal was brought under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the order did not cite any statutory provision, precedent, or further legal test as the basis for dismissal.
Source reference: p. 5–6Reasoning
The Court recorded that both appellants were deceased and that no application or other steps had been taken to substitute their legal representatives.
Source reference: p. 6In those circumstances, it treated the appeal as abated and dismissed it without examining the merits of the challenge to the trial court’s decree.
Source reference: p. 6Holding
The appeal was dismissed as abated because no steps had been taken to bring the deceased appellants’ legal representatives on record.
The Court made no order as to costs and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
Source reference: p. 6Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Code of Civil Procedure, 19081
Original Court PDF
VENKATAMMAL DIED PalaniammvsSEERANGAMMAL DIED 1. Renga
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
