Madras High Court
Civil Procedure and EvidenceCivil Law

An appeal abates when deceased appellants’ legal representatives are not brought on record.

VENKATAMMAL DIED Palaniamm vs SEERANGAMMAL DIED 1. Renga

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: October 14, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
An appeal abates when deceased appellants’ legal representatives are not brought on record.. VENKATAMMAL   DIED Palaniamm vs SEERANGAMMAL  DIED  1. Renga. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellants had filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging the decree dated 29 July 2021 in O.S. No. 140 of 2016.

Source reference: p. 5–6

At the hearing, counsel reported that both appellants had died: the first appellant had died before the appeal was filed, and the second died on 19 September 2024.

Source reference: p. 5–6

No steps had been taken to bring their legal representatives on record.

Source reference: p. 5–6
02

Issues

1. Whether the appeal could proceed when both appellants had died and no steps had been taken to bring their legal representatives on record

Source reference: p. 6

2. Whether the appeal should be dismissed as abated in those circumstances

Source reference: p. 6
03

Law Applied

The Court applied the procedural principle that an appeal abates when the deceased appellant’s legal representatives are not brought on record and the appeal cannot proceed in their absence.

Source reference: p. 5–6

Although the appeal was brought under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the order did not cite any statutory provision, precedent, or further legal test as the basis for dismissal.

Source reference: p. 5–6
04

Reasoning

The Court recorded that both appellants were deceased and that no application or other steps had been taken to substitute their legal representatives.

Source reference: p. 6

In those circumstances, it treated the appeal as abated and dismissed it without examining the merits of the challenge to the trial court’s decree.

Source reference: p. 6
05

Holding

The appeal was dismissed as abated because no steps had been taken to bring the deceased appellants’ legal representatives on record.

The Court made no order as to costs and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

Source reference: p. 6
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Code of Civil Procedure, 19081

Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

VENKATAMMAL DIED PalaniammvsSEERANGAMMAL DIED 1. Renga

Madras High Court · October 14, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment