Facts
Smt. Shribati died in a motor-vehicle accident on 09.05.2019 involving pickup vehicle No. OR-24-B-6990.
Source reference: para. 1The Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bastar at Jagdalpur, awarded compensation of ₹9,55,376 with interest at 9% per annum from the date of the claim application until realization, in Claim Case No. 129/2019.
Source reference: para. 1The insurer challenged the award under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, contending that the vehicle’s driver, Ramesh Kumar Dewangan, possessed only a Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) licence and not a licence specifically authorising him to drive a transport/goods-carrier vehicle.
Source reference: paras. 2, 5The driver’s licence was valid from 09.09.2011 to 07.09.2031. The vehicle’s unladen weight was 1,710 kg and laden weight was 2,880 kg.
Source reference: para. 7Issues
1. Whether a driver holding a valid LMV licence is legally authorised to drive a transport/goods-carrier vehicle whose gross vehicle weight does not exceed 7,500 kg.
Source reference: paras. 5–72. Whether the alleged absence of a separate transport-vehicle endorsement constituted a breach of the insurance policy, entitling the insurer to exoneration from liability.
Source reference: paras. 2, 5, 83. Whether the Tribunal’s award of ₹9,55,376 with interest at 9% per annum required interference in appeal.
Source reference: paras. 1, 8–9Law Applied
The Court applied Sections 2(21), 2(15), 2(48), and 10(2)(d) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, under which a “light motor vehicle” includes a transport vehicle whose prescribed weight does not exceed 7,500 kg, and a licence to drive an LMV is sufficient to drive such a vehicle.
Source reference: para. 6The Court relied principally on Mukund Dewangan v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., (2017) 14 SCC 663, which held that no separate endorsement is required to drive a transport vehicle falling within the LMV category and that an LMV licence remains valid for such vehicles.
Source reference: para. 6The appeal was maintainable under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Source reference: para. 1Reasoning
The driver held a valid LMV licence on the date of the accident, 09.05.2019.
Source reference: para. 7The offending pickup had an unladen weight of 1,710 kg and a laden weight of 2,880 kg, both well below the 7,500 kg threshold for an LMV.
Source reference: para. 7Applying Mukund Dewangan, the Court held that the vehicle remained within the LMV category despite being used as a transport/goods vehicle, and that no separate transport endorsement was necessary.
Source reference: para. 6Consequently, the driver was duly licensed, there was no breach of the insurance-policy condition, and the insurer could not avoid its statutory liability to satisfy the compensation award.
Source reference: paras. 6–8Holding
The Court answered the licensing and policy-breach issues against the Insurance Company.
It held that the driver possessed a valid and effective licence to drive the offending pickup and that no breach of the insurance policy had been established.
Source reference: para. 8The appeal was found devoid of merit and was dismissed, leaving undisturbed the Tribunal’s award of ₹9,55,376 with interest at 9% per annum.
Source reference: para. 9Acts & Sections Cited
3 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.
Motor Vehicles Act, 19883
Original Court PDF
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.vsDOMURAM PATEL
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
