Chhattisgarh High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

An unskilled labourer’s income for compensation must reflect the applicable notified minimum wage.

ARJUNDAS MANIKPURI vs AFTAB QURESHI

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 12, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
An unskilled labourer’s income for compensation must reflect the applicable notified minimum wage.. ARJUNDAS MANIKPURI vs AFTAB QURESHI. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellants, claimants and children of the deceased Sushila Manikpuri, challenged a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award arising from her death in a road accident on 5 December 2021.

Source reference: para. 1–4, 6

The Tribunal had assessed her monthly income as ₹7,800 and awarded total compensation of ₹12,07,256.

Source reference: para. 1–4, 6

In their appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the appellants sought enhancement, contending that the deceased earned ₹12,000 per month as a labourer.

Source reference: para. 1–4, 6

The insurer opposed interference with the award.

Source reference: para. 1–4, 6
02

Issues

1. Whether the Tribunal erred in assessing the deceased’s monthly income at ₹7,800, and whether it should be revised by reference to the applicable minimum-wage notification.

Source reference: para. 6

2. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal required enhancement.

Source reference: para. 7–9
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of a Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: para. 1

In assessing compensation for death, the Court applied the principles in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation and Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram, concerning, among other matters, future prospects, deductions for personal expenses, multiplier selection and conventional heads of compensation.

Source reference: para. 7–8

The Court also relied on the Chhattisgarh minimum-wage notification for unskilled labour to determine the deceased’s income.

Source reference: para. 6
04

Reasoning

The claimants’ assertion that the deceased earned ₹12,000 per month was unsupported by cogent and reliable evidence.

Source reference: para. 6

However, the Tribunal’s income assessment of ₹7,800 was lower than the applicable minimum wage for an unskilled labourer on the date of the accident.

Source reference: para. 6

The Court therefore substituted monthly income of ₹9,280.

Source reference: para. 6

It left undisturbed the Tribunal’s application of 25% future prospects, a one-third deduction for personal expenses, a multiplier of 13, and the amounts awarded under the conventional heads and for medical expenses.

Source reference: para. 7–8

Recalculation on that basis resulted in total compensation of ₹13,99,656.

Source reference: para. 8
05

Holding

The appeal was partly allowed.

The award was enhanced from ₹12,07,256 to ₹13,99,656, entitling the appellants to an additional ₹1,92,400, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim application until realization.

Source reference: para. 9–10

The remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left unchanged.

Source reference: para. 9–10

The Registry was directed to notify the claimants in writing, in Hindi, of the enhanced amount.

Source reference: para. 11
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

ARJUNDAS MANIKPURIvsAFTAB QURESHI

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment