Chhattisgarh High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

An unskilled worker’s income must reflect the minimum wages notified for the date of the accident.

HEMSAI RATHIYA vs HIMANSHU TIRKEY

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 08, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
An unskilled worker’s income must reflect the minimum wages notified for the date of the accident.. HEMSAI RATHIYA vs HIMANSHU TIRKEY. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellants, parents of the deceased Arjun Rathia, appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded for his death in a road accident on 16 December 2024.

Source reference: para. 1

The Claims Tribunal had awarded Rs. 14,15,480, assessing the deceased’s monthly income at Rs. 9,100 and awarding Rs. 40,000 consortium to each claimant. The appellants argued that the applicable minimum wage for unskilled labour was Rs. 10,428 per month and that the consortium award was inadequate.

Source reference: para. 2
02

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in assessing the deceased’s monthly income at Rs. 9,100 rather than the applicable minimum wage of Rs. 10,428

Source reference: para. 2; para. 5

Whether the compensation awarded, including consortium, required enhancement

Source reference: para. 2; para. 6; para. 7; para. 8
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against a Claims Tribunal award.

Source reference: para. 1

In assessing compensation, the Court relied on National Insurance Co. v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680; Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation, (2009) 6 SCC 121; and Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram, (2018) 18 SCC 130, applying the principles governing future prospects, personal-expense deductions, multiplier selection, and consortium.

Source reference: para. 7

The Court also used the Chhattisgarh Labour Commissioner’s minimum-wage notification to assess the income of an unskilled labourer at the time of the accident.

Source reference: para. 5
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the Tribunal had undervalued the deceased’s income and substituted the notified minimum wage of Rs. 10,428 per month.

Source reference: para. 5

It upheld the Tribunal’s application of 40% future prospects, a one-half deduction for personal expenses, and a multiplier of 17, having regard to the deceased’s age, self-employed status, and the number of claimants.

Source reference: para. 6

It increased consortium from Rs. 40,000 to Rs. 48,000 for each of the two claimants and recalculated the total compensation at Rs. 16,21,115.

Source reference: para. 6; para. 7; para. 8
05

Holding

The Court partly allowed the appeal and enhanced the award from Rs. 14,15,480 to Rs. 16,21,115.

The appellants were granted an additional Rs. 2,05,635, carrying interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim application until realization; the remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left undisturbed.

Source reference: para. 8; para. 9

The Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimants in Hindi.

Source reference: para. 10
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

HEMSAI RATHIYAvsHIMANSHU TIRKEY

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment