Karnataka High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Ankle Fractures Affecting Farm Work: Karnataka HC Raises Farmer’s Accident Compensation To ₹4.49 Lakh After Assessing 8% Functional Disability

VITTHALv.BANDOPANTH

Ankle Fractures Affecting Farm Work: Karnataka HC Raises Farmer’s Accident Compensation To ₹4.49 Lakh After Assessing 8% Functional Disability. VITTHAL vs BANDOPANTH. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the appellant’s functional disability at 5% should be increased, having regard to his ankle fractures and agricultural occupation.

The court held

The appeal was allowed in part and the total compensation was enhanced from ₹2,87,692 to ₹4,49,318, an increase of ₹1,61,626.

It also directed

The enhanced amount carries interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realization.

The Insurance Company was directed to deposit it within six weeks of receiving the certified judgment, for release to the appellant on due identification.

01Facts

Vitthal, an agriculturist, sustained fractures to the right medial and lateral malleoli and the fourth and fifth right metatarsal bones when a car struck his motorcycle from behind on 19 February 2023.

pp. 3–4, 17

He sought compensation in MVC No. 41/2024; the Tribunal awarded ₹2,87,692 with 6% interest, assessing whole-body and functional disability at 5%.

pp. 5–6, 9–10

On appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, he challenged the adequacy of the compensation, including the disability assessment and awards under other heads.

pp. 2, 6–8

02Issues

i.1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the appellant’s functional disability at 5% should be increased, having regard to his ankle fractures and agricultural occupation.

pp. 9–10, 14–16

ii.2. Whether the compensation awarded under the relevant heads should be enhanced.

pp. 17–20

03Law Applied

Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act provides for an appeal against a Claims Tribunal’s award.

p. 2

In assessing loss of future income, National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, AIR 2017 SC 5157, supports adding 40% to income for future prospects in the circumstances applied here; the Court also applied a multiplier of 16 based on the appellant’s age.

p. 16

Functional disability is not determined by a rigid one-third conversion of limb disability: it must be assessed in light of the injury’s nature and consequences and the injured person’s occupation.

pp. 14–16

The Court accepted the KSLSA chart income of ₹15,250 per month in the absence of proof of earnings.

p. 16

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Tribunal had reduced the doctor’s 15% disability assessment to 5% by applying a one-third approach.

pp. 9–10

The High Court considered the fractures’ potential effects on ankle stability and movement, including difficulty with squatting and other activities, and related those effects to agricultural work, which requires standing, walking, sitting and squatting.

pp. 11–16

It therefore assessed functional disability at 8%, rather than applying a mechanical conversion.

pp. 14–16

Using monthly income of ₹15,250, adding 40% for future prospects and applying multiplier 16, it calculated future income loss at ₹3,27,936.

pp. 16–17

It found no basis to increase medical expenses, but enhanced compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, laid-up-period income, and special diet, transportation and attendant charges.

pp. 17–20

05Holding

The appeal was allowed in part and the total compensation was enhanced from ₹2,87,692 to ₹4,49,318, an increase of ₹1,61,626.

pp. 20–21

The enhanced amount carries interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realization.

p. 21

The Insurance Company was directed to deposit it within six weeks of receiving the certified judgment, for release to the appellant on due identification.

p. 21
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

VITTHALvsBANDOPANTH

Karnataka High Court · October 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment