Chhattisgarh High Court
Criminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Anticipatory bail granted after noting simple injuries, no criminal antecedents, and the complainant’s no-objection.

ARIF KHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Anticipatory bail granted after noting simple injuries, no criminal antecedents, and the complainant’s no-objection.. ARIF KHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Crime No. 124/2026, registered for alleged offences under Sections 109, 115(2), 296 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Source reference: para. 1

The prosecution alleged that during an Eid-Milad-un-Nabi procession, the applicant assaulted the complainant and another person, including allegedly inflicting a knife injury on the complainant.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant denied causing the injuries with a knife, relied on the absence of criminal antecedents and submitted that the complainant had no objection to bail.

Source reference: para. 3

The State opposed the application but confirmed that the injuries were simple and that the applicant had no criminal antecedents.

Source reference: paras. 4–5

The complainant, present through counsel, also expressed no objection.

Source reference: para. 6
02

Issues

Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with the alleged offences.

Source reference: paras. 1, 8

Whether the circumstances—including the simple nature of the injuries, the absence of criminal antecedents and the complainant’s lack of objection—supported granting anticipatory bail.

Source reference: paras. 3–6, 8
03

Law Applied

Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, provides for a direction granting bail in anticipation of arrest.

Source reference: para. 1

The court may grant such relief subject to appropriate conditions, including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses or the investigation, conduct consistent with a fair trial, and appearance before the trial court.

Source reference: para. 9

The judgment cites no precedent and does not set out any further legal test.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

Considering the allegations and the parties’ submissions, the Court noted that the medical reports recorded simple injuries, the applicant had no criminal antecedents, and the complainant did not oppose bail.

Source reference: paras. 3–6

On the overall facts and circumstances, and without expressing any opinion on the merits, the Court found it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail.

Source reference: para. 8

It imposed conditions to secure the applicant’s cooperation with the investigation and attendance at trial.

Source reference: para. 9
05

Holding

The Court allowed the application.

It directed that, in the event of arrest in the crime, the applicant be released on anticipatory bail upon executing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety for the like sum, subject to the conditions specified in the order.

Source reference: para. 9

A certified copy was directed to be sent to the trial court for information and compliance.

Source reference: para. 10
06

Acts & Sections Cited

5 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20234

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

ARIF KHANvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment