Chhattisgarh High Court

Anticipatory bail granted in abetment of suicide case based on parity with co-accused.

Ramesh Paliwal & Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh [2026:CGHC:11432]

Chhattisgarh High Court2 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicants filed a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

Source reference: para 1

They were accused under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, for abetting the suicide of Ramkhilavan Sahu.

Source reference: para 1, 3

The deceased left a suicide note alleging that the applicants pressurized him to repay a balance loan of ₹14,000 out of a total debt of ₹64,000, leading him to hang himself on 19.11.2025.

Source reference: para 3

The applicants’ first anticipatory bail application (MCRCA No. 1936 of 2025) was dismissed as withdrawn on 09.12.2025.

Source reference: para 2

A co-accused, Rajendra Golchha, was granted bail on 08.01.2026.

Source reference: para 4
02

Issues

Whether the applicants are entitled to the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS despite the previous withdrawal of a similar application and the presence of a suicide note naming them.

Source reference: para 7
03

Law Applied

The Court applied Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the High Court's power to grant anticipatory bail.

Source reference: para 1, 7

It examined the elements of Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, concerning the abetment of suicide.

Source reference: para 1

The Court also adhered to the principle of parity in bail matters, considering the previous grant of bail to a similarly situated co-accused.

Source reference: para 4, 7
04

Reasoning

The Court evaluated the facts and circumstances alongside the submissions from both parties.

Source reference: no citation

While the State opposed the bail citing the rejection of another co-accused’s bail (MCRCA No. 41 of 2026), the Court placed significant weight on the fact that one co-accused, Rajendra Golchha, had already been granted bail by the same Court.

Source reference: para 5, 7

The Court noted the specific allegations regarding the monetary dispute and the withdrawal of the first application as procedural history.

Source reference: para 4, 7

Based on the principle of parity and the overall circumstances of the case, the Court found it fit to exercise its discretion in favor of the applicants.

Source reference: para 7
05

Holding

The Court allowed the MCRCA, granting anticipatory bail to Ramesh Paliwal and Umesh Paliwal.

The Court answered the issue in the affirmative, directing that in the event of arrest, the applicants be released upon executing a personal bond with one surety.

Source reference: para 8

Relief was granted subject to specific conditions: the applicants must not influence witnesses, must cause no prejudice to the trial, must appear for all court dates, must provide verified Aadhaar/photograph identification, and must not engage in similar future offenses.

Source reference: para 8(a)-(e)
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

Ramesh Paliwal & Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh [2026:CGHC:11432]

Chhattisgarh High Court

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment