Chhattisgarh High Court

Anticipatory bail granted under Section 69 BNS where major victim was a consenting party.

DINESH RAJWADE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 18, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant filed a first anticipatory bail application apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 43/2026 for offences under Section 69 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS), 2023.

Source reference: para 1

The prosecution alleged that between June 15, 2022, and February 7, 2026, the applicant repeatedly engaged in sexual intercourse with the victim on the pretext of marriage, but subsequently refused to marry her.

Source reference: para 2

The applicant contended that the victim is a major, the relationship was consensual, and the marriage could not proceed because both parties belong to the same patronymic (Goutra), leading to family opposition.

Source reference: para 3
02

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, in light of the consensual nature of the long-term relationship.

Source reference: para 1, 6
03

Law Applied

Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the discretionary power to grant anticipatory bail.

Source reference: para 1

Section 69 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS), 2023, which pertains to sexual intercourse on the basis of a false promise to marry.

Source reference: para 1

The court took into account the evidentiary value of the victim's statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS.

Source reference: para 4, 6
04

Reasoning

The court examined the facts and circumstances, specifically noting the gravity of the offence versus the nature of the relationship.

Source reference: para 6

It observed that the victim is a major and was a "consenting party" throughout a relationship that spanned nearly four years.

Source reference: para 6

The court noted that the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS confirmed a long-term love relationship.

Source reference: para 4

The court accepted the applicant’s argument that the refusal to marry stemmed from social/family constraints (the same 'Goutra') rather than initial deceit.

Source reference: para 3

Considering that the investigation and trial would likely be prolonged, the court found the applicant’s liberty outweighed the necessity of custodial interrogation.

Source reference: para 6
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the anticipatory bail application.

The court directed that in the event of arrest, the applicant be released on bail upon executing a personal bond and one surety to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to several conditions, including that the applicant must not threaten witnesses, must appear for all trial dates, must provide verified identification (Aadhaar), and must not involve himself in similar future offences.

Source reference: para 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

DINESH RAJWADEvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 18, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment