Facts
The applicants sought anticipatory bail regarding Crime No. 25/2026 registered at Police Station Sanna, District Jashpur.
Source reference: para 1On March 4, 2026, the complainant alleged that the applicants arrived at her house in a Bolero vehicle, verbally abused her husband, and assaulted him with hands, fists, and a wooden stick (danda), causing injuries to his head and face.
Source reference: para 2It was further alleged that Applicant No. 2 slapped a witness and snatched her mobile phone.
Source reference: para 2The applicants contended they were falsely implicated; Applicant No. 1 is handicapped and claimed the charges were retaliation for a complaint he filed regarding fraudulent names in a 2002 survey list.
Source reference: para 3The State noted that while the applicants have one criminal antecedent, the victim's injuries were simple in nature.
Source reference: para 4Issues
1. Whether the applicants are entitled to the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering the nature of the injuries and the circumstances of the case.
Source reference: para 1, 5Law Applied
Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the directions for grant of bail to persons apprehending arrest.
Source reference: para 1Sections 296 (obscene acts/songs), 351(2) (criminal intimidation), 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt), 3(5) (joint liability), 309(4) (robbery/extortion-related), and 331(6) (house-trespass/hurt) of the BNS, 2023.
Source reference: para 1Reasoning
The Court weighed the prosecution's allegations against the medical and procedural realities of the case. Although the State opposed bail citing a criminal antecedent, it conceded that the injuries sustained by the victim were medically classified as "simple in nature".
Source reference: para 4, 5The Court observed that the trial was likely to take a considerable amount of time to conclude.
Source reference: para 5By balancing the handicap status of Applicant No. 1 and the non-grievous nature of the injuries against the need for judicial presence, the Court determined that custodial interrogation was not necessitated and the applicants' liberty could be secured through stringent bail conditions.
Source reference: para 5, 6Holding
The High Court allowed the anticipatory bail application.
It directed that in the event of arrest, Shrinath Sahni and Deepak Sahni be released on a personal bond and one surety each, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, regular appearances, Aadhaar verification, and a mandate not to involve themselves in similar future offenses.
Source reference: para 6(a)-(e)Original Court PDF
SHRINATH SAHNIvsTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in