Chhattisgarh High Court

Anticipatory bail granted where major parties’ consensual relationship failed to materialize into marriage under Section 69 BNS.

VINOD DONGRE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 25, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, a 42-year-old laborer, sought anticipatory bail regarding Crime No. 442/2025 registered at Police Station Pali for an offence under Section 69 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

Source reference: para. 2, 4

The prosecutrix, a married woman with a child, filed a written report on December 17, 2025, alleging that the applicant engaged in sexual intercourse with her on the pretext of marriage between November 28, 2023, and November 30, 2025

Source reference: para. 3, 4

The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, arising from a love affair, and clarified via affidavit that the criminal antecedents mentioned in the lower court's rejection order did not pertain to him

Source reference: para. 1, 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the protection of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) given the allegations of sexual intercourse on the pretext of marriage

Source reference: para. 2, 7
03

Law Applied

Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which governs the grant of anticipatory bail

Source reference: para. 2

Section 69 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which criminalizes sexual intercourse by deceitful means or through a false promise of marriage

Source reference: para. 2

the evidentiary value of the victim's statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The Court evaluated the facts and circumstances alongside the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS

Source reference: para. 7

The Court observed that the prosecutrix is a major lady who entered into a relationship with the applicant

Source reference: para. 7

The Bench noted that the parties had established a consensual relationship, and the First Information Report (FIR) appeared to have been lodged only after the relationship failed to materialize into marriage

Source reference: para. 7

Given that the applicant is a permanent resident and undertook to cooperate with the investigation, the Court found the element of "pretext" insufficient at this stage to warrant custodial interrogation

Source reference: para. 4, 7
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the application for anticipatory bail

The Court held that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released upon executing a personal bond with one surety

Source reference: para. 8

The grant of bail was made subject to conditions, including: (a) non-interference with witnesses; (b) cooperation with a fair trial; (c) regular appearance before the trial court; (d) verification of Aadhaar and identity details; and (e) refraining from committing similar offences in the future

Source reference: para. 8
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

VINOD DONGREvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment