Facts
The applicant, Sayra Bano, sought anticipatory bail regarding Crime No. 687/2025 registered at Police Station Industrial Area, Jaora, for multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
Source reference: p. 1The prosecution alleged that on December 12, 2025, a physical scuffle broke out between neighbors.
Source reference: p. 2It was alleged that the applicant’s family members entered the complainant's house and assaulted them with sticks and iron rods.
Source reference: p. 2Specifically, the applicant was accused of assaulting one Zeenat with a wooden washing bat (mogri), causing simple injuries.
Source reference: p. 2The applicant contended that this was a case of "free fight" and over-implication of family members, noting a cross-case (FIR 688/2025) where her brother-in-law also sustained head injuries.
Source reference: p. 2The applicant is a 36-year-old homemaker and a mother of a minor child with no prior criminal record.
Source reference: p. 2, 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the protection of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, given the nature of the allegations and the existence of a cross-case
Source reference: p. 1, 32. Whether custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary for the purpose of the investigation
Source reference: p. 3Law Applied
The court primarily applied Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the grant of bail to persons apprehending arrest.
Source reference: p. 1The substantive charges were examined under Sections 331(3), 296(a), 115(2), 351(2), 3(5), 331(5), 125, 117(2), and 191(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
Source reference: p. 1, 2The court also relied on the principle that bail is intended to prevent social disrepute and humiliation where incarceration is not necessary for investigation and where there is no likelihood of the accused fleeing justice.
Source reference: p. 3Reasoning
The court observed that the dispute appeared to be a "free fight" arising from a minor altercation between neighbors that escalated into a physical scuffle.
Source reference: p. 2While the medical report revealed a depressed fracture on another victim (Abbas), the specific allegation against the applicant was limited to causing simple injuries to Zeenat using a washing bat.
Source reference: p. 2The court found substance in the applicant's plea of over-implication, noting that all family members were involved based on omnibus allegations.
Source reference: p. 2Given that the applicant is a homemaker with a minor child and has no criminal antecedents, the court determined there was no likelihood of her fleeing from justice or tampering with evidence.
Source reference: p. 3Crucially, the court held that custodial interrogation was not required for the investigation and that the grant of anticipatory bail would not prejudice the state's case.
Source reference: p. 3Holding
The court allowed the application for anticipatory bail, holding that the applicant's incarceration would cause undue hardship and social humiliation.
The court directed that in the event of arrest, the applicant be released on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one solvent surety of the like amount.
Source reference: p. 4The bail was made subject to conditions including: (i) making herself available for investigation; (ii) refraining from committing similar offences; (iii) not inducing or threatening witnesses; and (iv) ensuring compliance with Section 346 of the BNSS regarding trial attendance.
Source reference: p. 4The order remains effective until the end of the trial unless breached.
Source reference: p. 4Original Court PDF
Sayra BanovsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in