Madras High CourtCivil Procedure and EvidenceAdministrative and Public Law

Appellant Withdraws Leave Plea; Madras HC Rejects Writ Appeal At SR Stage

M. MUNEESWARANv.A. HAMID SULTAN

Appellant Withdraws Leave Plea; Madras HC Rejects Writ Appeal At SR Stage. M. MUNEESWARAN vs A. HAMID SULTAN. Madras High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the appellant should be permitted to revoke the existing vakalatnama and appoint new counsel.

The court held

The application to revoke the vakalatnama was allowed.

It also directed

The application seeking leave to file the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and the writ appeal was rejected at the SR stage.

01Facts

The appellant sought to challenge an order dated 17 June 2022 in W.P. No. 14179 of 2016 by filing a writ appeal, for which he had applied for leave to appeal.

p. 4

He also sought permission to revoke his existing vakalatnama and appoint new counsel.

p. 4

The new counsel requested leave to withdraw the application for leave to appeal.

p. 4

The Court allowed the vakalatnama application and dismissed the leave application as withdrawn; consequently, it rejected the writ appeal at the SR stage.

p. 5

02Issues

i.Whether the appellant should be permitted to revoke the existing vakalatnama and appoint new counsel.

p. 4

ii.Whether the appellant could withdraw the application seeking leave to file the writ appeal and, consequently, whether the appeal should remain before the Court.

p. 5

03Law Applied

The appellant invoked Order 2, Rule 4(3) of the Appellate Side Rules for permission to revoke the vakalatnama and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for leave to file the appeal.

p. 4

The judgment states no further statutory test, precedent, or substantive legal principle; it records the Court’s procedural orders allowing the vakalatnama application and permitting withdrawal of the leave application.

p. 5

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 151

04Reasoning

The Court allowed the request to revoke the vakalatnama.

p. 5

It then acted on the new counsel’s request, supported by a circulated letter, to withdraw the application for leave to appeal.

p. 5

Once that application was dismissed as withdrawn, the writ appeal could not proceed and was rejected at the SR stage.

p. 5

The Court did not address the merits of the challenged writ petition order.

05Holding

The application to revoke the vakalatnama was allowed.

p. 5

The application seeking leave to file the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and the writ appeal was rejected at the SR stage.

p. 5
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

M. MUNEESWARANvsA. HAMID SULTAN

Madras High Court · October 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment