CAT - ['Delhi']
Administrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Applicants may withdraw the original application; interim protection consequently stands vacated.

MANISHA SHARMA vs KALAWATI SARAN CHILDRENS HOSPITAL

CAT - ['Delhi']JUDGMENT: September 15, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Applicants may withdraw the original application; interim protection consequently stands vacated.. MANISHA SHARMA vs KALAWATI SARAN CHILDRENS HOSPITAL. CAT - ['Delhi']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The seven applicants had instituted O.A. No. 1709/2022 before the Central Administrative Tribunal against the Union of India and authorities of Kalawati Saran Children’s Hospital/Lady Hardinge Medical College.

Source reference: para. 2

During the pendency of the O.A., the applicants instituted separate proceedings seeking regularization and obtained interim protection in those proceedings.

Source reference: para. 2

In view of these subsequent developments, they filed M.A. No. 4443/2026 seeking permission to voluntarily withdraw the present O.A.

Source reference: para. 2

The respondents stated that they had no objection to the withdrawal.

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

Whether the applicants should be permitted to withdraw O.A. No. 1709/2022 in view of the separate regularization proceedings instituted by them and the interim protection granted therein.

Source reference: para. 2–4

Whether any interim order or pending miscellaneous application in the withdrawn O.A. should continue thereafter.

Source reference: para. 5
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal applied the procedural principle that an applicant may voluntarily withdraw proceedings when the withdrawal is consciously sought and no prejudice or objection is demonstrated by the opposing party.

Source reference: no citation

It further applied the consequential rule that, upon dismissal of an original application as withdrawn, interim orders granted in that proceeding ordinarily cease to operate, and pending miscellaneous applications are disposed of accordingly.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The applicants expressly sought withdrawal because they had pursued separate proceedings for regularization and had secured interim protection in those proceedings.

Source reference: para. 2

Since the respondents raised no objection, the Tribunal found sufficient grounds to permit withdrawal and allowed M.A. No. 4443/2026.

Source reference: para. 3–4

As the O.A. was no longer being adjudicated on its merits, the Tribunal directed that it be dismissed as withdrawn and clarified that any interim protection granted in the O.A. would stand vacated; pending miscellaneous applications were also to be disposed of consequentially.

Source reference: para. 5
05

Holding

M.A. No. 4443/2026 was allowed, and the applicants were permitted to withdraw O.A. No. 1709/2022.

Consequently, the O.A. was dismissed as withdrawn; any interim order granted therein was vacated; and all other pending miscellaneous applications stood disposed of. No order as to costs was made.

Source reference: para. 5
CAT - ['Delhi']

Original Court PDF

MANISHA SHARMAvsKALAWATI SARAN CHILDRENS HOSPITAL

CAT - ['Delhi'] · September 15, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment