Supreme CourtEnvironmental LawConstitutional Law

Article 21 mandates Zero Liquid Discharge and specialized judicial oversight to remedy systemic industrial riverine pollution.

In Re: 2 Million Lives At Risk, Contamination In Jojari River, Rajasthan vs

Article 21 mandates Zero Liquid Discharge and specialized judicial oversight to remedy systemic industrial riverine pollution.. In Re: 2 Million Lives At Risk, Contamination In Jojari River, Rajasthan vs. Supreme Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the existing institutional and infrastructural framework is sufficient to arrest the systemic environmental degradation and ensure the restoration of the Jojari/Luni river system

The court held

The Court accorded its full "imprimatur" to the HLEOC's directions

It also directed

Directed the immediate completion of the Salawas CETP and the 23km effluent conveyance system by May 11, 2026

Directed HPCL Rajasthan Refinery (HRRL) to utilize Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds to establish treatment infrastructure in the region

Mandated the RSPCB to replace estimation-based waste calculation with a technology-driven machinery-based system within two months

Ordered the immediate closure of any violating unit/CETP; repeat violators must seek prior leave from the Supreme Court to resume operations

Requested the Rajasthan High Court to constitute Special Courts in Jodhpur, Pali, and Balotra for the expeditious adjudication of environmental crimes

Directed the State to restore the natural flow path of the Jojari River and provide sustainable infrastructure-based potable water supply to affected villages

The matter is listed for further compliance monitoring on July 21, 2026

01Facts

The Supreme Court took suo moto cognizance of the severe ecological degradation of the Jojari River system in Rajasthan

¶ 1

On November 21, 2025, the Court modified an interim stay on a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order, allowing remedial directions to proceed while staying only the ₹2 crore compensation imposed on the Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation (RIICO)

¶ 1

The Court constituted a High-Level Ecosystem Oversight Committee (HLEOC) chaired by Justice Sangeet Lodha (Retd.) to monitor restoration

¶ 2

The HLEOC’s status report revealed systemic failures: massive sewage treatment gaps (e.g., a 55 MLD deficit in Jodhpur), operational failures of Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs), and widespread industrial discharge via illegal tankers and concealed pipelines

¶ 14, 18-20

Field inspections documented the mortality of Babul trees, groundwater contamination of 400-year-old wells, and the submergence of government schools

¶ 22-24

Evidence further suggested administrative attempts to conceal violations by leveling riverbeds prior to inspections

¶ 43

02Issues

i.Whether the existing institutional and infrastructural framework is sufficient to arrest the systemic environmental degradation and ensure the restoration of the Jojari/Luni river system

¶ 11

ii.Whether the State’s failure to bridge the gap between sewage/effluent generation and treatment capacity constitutes a violation of the "Polluter Pays" principle and Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) norms

¶ 16, 21, 48

iii.Whether the continued contamination of water bodies and groundwater constitutes a violation of the fundamental right to life and clean water under Article 21 of the Constitution

¶ 51-52

03Law Applied

Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees the right to a pollution-free environment and access to safe drinking water as an integral facet of the right to life

¶ 51, 56

"Polluter Pays" Principle, requiring that the costs of pollution be borne by those who cause it

¶ 3, 48

Doctrine of Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) to mandate the recycling of all industrial wastewater

¶ 14, 50

Precedent of State of Karnataka v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2000), which established water as a "prime natural resource" and a "precious national asset" essential for human survival

¶ 51

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 133

04Reasoning

The Court observed a "disturbing pattern of administrative apathy" and a collapse of regulatory mechanisms

¶ 10

It noted a sharp incongruity: while some CETPs operate below capacity, large volumes of untreated effluents are simultaneously bypassed into the river via illegal means, indicating systemic evasion

¶ 46

The Court linked environmental injury directly to social consequences, such as the deprivation of education due to submerged schools and the loss of agrarian livelihoods due to soil salinity, classifying these as constitutional infractions

¶ 42, 49

It criticized the State for a three-month delay in providing administrative support to the HLEOC, reflecting a "lack of seriousness"

¶ 45

Applying the Polluter Pays principle, the Court found the failure of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) to utilize allotted land at Salawas for treatment infrastructure as a basis for coercive action

¶ 48

The Court concluded that the destruction of the river’s natural flow path exacerbated the spread of toxins, necessitating a return to the river's original hydrological channel

¶ 50

05Holding

The Court accorded its full "imprimatur" to the HLEOC's directions

¶ 33

Directed the immediate completion of the Salawas CETP and the 23km effluent conveyance system by May 11, 2026

¶ 55A, 55C

Directed HPCL Rajasthan Refinery (HRRL) to utilize Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds to establish treatment infrastructure in the region

¶ 55D

Mandated the RSPCB to replace estimation-based waste calculation with a technology-driven machinery-based system within two months

¶ 55G

Ordered the immediate closure of any violating unit/CETP; repeat violators must seek prior leave from the Supreme Court to resume operations

¶ 55J

Requested the Rajasthan High Court to constitute Special Courts in Jodhpur, Pali, and Balotra for the expeditious adjudication of environmental crimes

¶ 55T

Directed the State to restore the natural flow path of the Jojari River and provide sustainable infrastructure-based potable water supply to affected villages

¶ 55L, 55S

The matter is listed for further compliance monitoring on July 21, 2026

¶ 61
Supreme Court

Original Court PDF

In Re: 2 Million Lives At Risk, Contamination In Jojari River, Rajasthan vs

Supreme Court · March 18, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment