CAT - ['Srinagar']
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Authorities must consider technical-pay-scale claims under SRO 149 and issue a reasoned decision within twelve weeks.

Mohammad shafi langoo vs POWER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

CAT - ['Srinagar']JUDGMENT: October 13, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Authorities must consider technical-pay-scale claims under SRO 149 and issue a reasoned decision within twelve weeks.. Mohammad shafi langoo vs POWER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. CAT - ['Srinagar']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicants, employees or former employees of the Power Development Department, claimed entitlement to the technical pay scale of ₹5,000–8,000 under SRO 149 of 1973 and corresponding revised scales and consequential benefits, including arrears and pensionary benefits.

Source reference: para. 2–8

They relied, among other materials, on the Division Bench judgment dated 8 May 2017 in Provincial Power Employees Union v. State, and on their representation dated 13 April 2026, which they said remained undecided.

Source reference: para. 2–8

After argument, their counsel requested that the Original Application be disposed of with a direction to treat it as a representation and decide the claim in accordance with law.

Source reference: para. 9

The respondents did not oppose disposal by appropriate directions, without prejudice to their rights and contentions.

Source reference: para. 10
02

Issues

Whether the applicants’ claims for the technical pay scale and consequential benefits should be considered by the respondents as a representation in light of the cited judgment and other materials.

Source reference: para. 9, 12

Whether the Tribunal should determine the applicants’ substantive entitlement to the claimed benefits at this stage.

Source reference: para. 11–14
03

Law Applied

The applicants invoked SRO 149 of 1973, the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1973, and subsequent revised-pay rules, as well as the Division Bench judgment dated 8 May 2017 in Provincial Power Employees Union v. State and other judicial pronouncements and Government orders.

Source reference: para. 2–6, 12

The Tribunal did not determine the scope or application of those sources.

Source reference: para. 9, 11–14

It applied the procedural approach that, where the applicants’ counsel seeks disposal on a limited representation-based direction, the competent authority may be directed to consider the claim under the applicable rules and law, without the Tribunal expressing an opinion on the merits.

Source reference: para. 9, 11–14
04

Reasoning

In view of the applicants’ narrowed request and the respondents’ position, the Tribunal found no useful purpose in keeping the Original Application pending.

Source reference: para. 9–11

It therefore directed consideration of the representation and supporting documents, including the cited judgments and Government orders.

Source reference: para. 12

The authority must determine whether the applicants are similarly situated to employees covered by those decisions and whether they satisfy the applicable eligibility conditions; that determination remains subject to the rules and any legal impediment.

Source reference: para. 12

The Tribunal expressly left all questions of fact and law open and made no finding on entitlement.

Source reference: para. 14
05

Holding

The Original Application was disposed of without adjudication on the merits.

The respondents were directed to consider the applicants’ representation dated 13 April 2026 and their claims for the technical pay scale of ₹5,000–8,000, corresponding revised scales, and consequential benefits, and to issue a detailed, reasoned and speaking order within 12 weeks of service of a certified copy of the Tribunal’s order.

Source reference: para. 12–15

No order as to costs was made.

Source reference: para. 16
CAT - ['Srinagar']

Original Court PDF

Mohammad shafi langoovsPOWER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

CAT - ['Srinagar'] · October 13, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment