CAT - ['Srinagar']

Authorities must decide re-employed ex-servicemen’s pay-fixation claims under applicable service rules.

Romesh chander vs PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT R AND B

CAT - ['Srinagar']JUDGMENT: October 15, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Authorities must decide re-employed ex-servicemen’s pay-fixation claims under applicable service rules.. Romesh chander  vs PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT R AND B. CAT - ['Srinagar']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The four applicants, all ex-servicemen re-employed as Class-IV/Multi-Tasking Staff in the Public Works (R&B) Department in 2021, contended that their pay had not been fixed in accordance with the applicable rules for re-employed ex-servicemen

Source reference: para. 3, 6–8

After submitting a representation and relying on several inter-departmental communications forwarding their cases for examination, they alleged that no final or reasoned decision had been communicated

Source reference: para. 4–5, 9–10

They sought pay fixation under Articles 259-A, 260-A and 260-C of the J&K Civil Services Regulations (CSRs), together with consequential benefits

Source reference: para. 2, 6
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicants’ pending pay-fixation grievance should be considered and decided by the respondents under the applicable rules and government instructions

Source reference: para. 9–13

2. Whether the Tribunal should itself determine the applicants’ entitlement to pay fixation and consequential benefits, or instead direct the respondents to decide that question

Source reference: para. 2, 12–13
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal directed the respondents to consider the applicants’ cases in accordance with the law and rules governing the field, specifically taking note of Articles 259-A, 260-A and 260-C of the J&K CSRs and Government Order No. 531-GAD of 2013 dated 28 March 2013

Source reference: para. 13

It did not determine the substantive meaning or application of those provisions, nor cite judicial precedents; the applicants’ eligibility and entitlements were left for the respondents to assess under the applicable rules

Source reference: para. 13
04

Reasoning

The applicants had submitted a pay-fixation representation, and the record described multiple communications seeking verification or examination of their cases, but no final decision had been communicated

Source reference: para. 4–5, 9–10

The Tribunal therefore directed the respondents to treat the O.A. as a representation and decide the grievance under the governing provisions and instructions.

Source reference: para. 13

It expressly refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits, leaving the assessment of eligibility and entitlement to the respondents

Source reference: para. 13
05

Holding

The O.A. was disposed of without a ruling on the applicants’ substantive entitlement to pay fixation.

The respondents were directed to consider and decide the applicants’ cases, having regard to Articles 259-A, 260-A and 260-C of the J&K CSRs and Government Order No. 531-GAD of 2013, preferably within eight weeks after service of a certified copy of the order

Source reference: para. 13

No order as to costs was made

Source reference: para. 15
CAT - ['Srinagar']

Original Court PDF

Romesh chandervsPUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT R AND B

CAT - ['Srinagar'] · October 15, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment