Facts
The four applicants, all ex-servicemen re-employed as Class-IV/Multi-Tasking Staff in the Public Works (R&B) Department in 2021, contended that their pay had not been fixed in accordance with the applicable rules for re-employed ex-servicemen
Source reference: para. 3, 6–8After submitting a representation and relying on several inter-departmental communications forwarding their cases for examination, they alleged that no final or reasoned decision had been communicated
Source reference: para. 4–5, 9–10They sought pay fixation under Articles 259-A, 260-A and 260-C of the J&K Civil Services Regulations (CSRs), together with consequential benefits
Source reference: para. 2, 6Issues
1. Whether the applicants’ pending pay-fixation grievance should be considered and decided by the respondents under the applicable rules and government instructions
Source reference: para. 9–132. Whether the Tribunal should itself determine the applicants’ entitlement to pay fixation and consequential benefits, or instead direct the respondents to decide that question
Source reference: para. 2, 12–13Law Applied
The Tribunal directed the respondents to consider the applicants’ cases in accordance with the law and rules governing the field, specifically taking note of Articles 259-A, 260-A and 260-C of the J&K CSRs and Government Order No. 531-GAD of 2013 dated 28 March 2013
Source reference: para. 13It did not determine the substantive meaning or application of those provisions, nor cite judicial precedents; the applicants’ eligibility and entitlements were left for the respondents to assess under the applicable rules
Source reference: para. 13Reasoning
The applicants had submitted a pay-fixation representation, and the record described multiple communications seeking verification or examination of their cases, but no final decision had been communicated
Source reference: para. 4–5, 9–10The Tribunal therefore directed the respondents to treat the O.A. as a representation and decide the grievance under the governing provisions and instructions.
Source reference: para. 13It expressly refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits, leaving the assessment of eligibility and entitlement to the respondents
Source reference: para. 13Holding
The O.A. was disposed of without a ruling on the applicants’ substantive entitlement to pay fixation.
The respondents were directed to consider and decide the applicants’ cases, having regard to Articles 259-A, 260-A and 260-C of the J&K CSRs and Government Order No. 531-GAD of 2013, preferably within eight weeks after service of a certified copy of the order
Source reference: para. 13No order as to costs was made
Source reference: para. 15Original Court PDF
Romesh chandervsPUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT R AND B
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![Authorities must decide re-employed ex-servicemen’s pay-fixation claims under applicable service rules.. Romesh chander vs PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT R AND B. CAT - ['Srinagar']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/authorities-must-decide-re-employed-ex-servicemens-pay-fixation-claims-under-applicable-se-1d3b9aff87114ca0a990b62d49678514.webp)