Madras High Court
Administrative and Public LawProperty and Real Estate Law

Authorities must follow statutory eviction procedures and afford encroachers an opportunity before removal.

R.BALAKRISHNAN vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: October 08, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Authorities must follow statutory eviction procedures and afford encroachers an opportunity before removal.. R.BALAKRISHNAN vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners sought a direction restraining the authorities from evicting them from specified lands in Ajjoor Village, Nilgiris District, without notice and due process under Section 68-A of the Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882, and Rule 2 of the Tamil Nadu Forest Lands (Eviction and Encroachment) Rules, 1981.

Source reference: p.9

The State informed the Court that the District Collector had constituted a committee to ascertain the facts and consider a solution to the alleged encroachments; further proceedings would follow receipt of its report.

Source reference: p.10
02

Issues

1. Whether the authorities could remove the petitioners from the disputed lands without following the procedure prescribed by the applicable statutes and rules.

Source reference: pp.9–11

2. Whether the petitioners were entitled to a direction that they be afforded an opportunity before any decision to remove them as encroachers.

Source reference: pp.10–11
03

Law Applied

The petitioners relied on Section 68-A of the Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882, and Rule 2 of the Tamil Nadu Forest Lands (Eviction and Encroachment) Rules, 1981, as the provisions governing eviction and encroachment.

Source reference: p.9

The Court did not interpret those provisions separately or cite precedent; it directed that any decision to remove encroachers must follow the procedures prescribed by the relevant statutes and rules in force and afford them an opportunity in the manner known to law.

Source reference: pp.10–11
04

Reasoning

Given the State’s submission that the Collector’s committee was still ascertaining the facts, and its assurance that any subsequent action would follow the applicable procedure, the Court treated the requested relief as general in nature.

Source reference: p.10

It therefore did not determine the petitioners’ status or the merits of the alleged encroachments, but made procedural compliance and an opportunity to the affected persons conditions of any removal decision.

Source reference: pp.10–11
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the respondent authorities, if they decide to remove the petitioners as encroachers, to follow the procedures under the relevant statutes and rules and afford them an opportunity.

No costs were ordered, and any connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

Source reference: p.11
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.

Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 18821

Section 68A
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

R.BALAKRISHNANvsTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Madras High Court · October 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment