Karnataka High Court
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Authorities must issue compassionate appointment after finding eligibility, subject to document verification.

SMT K R SHYLAJA vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 30, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Authorities must issue compassionate appointment after finding eligibility, subject to document verification.. SMT K R SHYLAJA vs STATE OF KARNATAKA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner sought appointment on compassionate grounds following the rejection of her claim on the ground that the Karnataka Civil Services (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 1996 did not provide for appointment of married daughters at the time of the government servant’s death

Source reference: p.3

The Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal dismissed her challenge to that rejection

Source reference: pp.2–3

The High Court noted its earlier order in the petitioner’s case and directed the State to reconsider her claim

Source reference: p.3

The State subsequently withdrew the rejection and informed the Court that the petitioner was found eligible, subject to verification of her documents

Source reference: pp.4–6
02

Issues

1. Whether the Tribunal’s order dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to the rejection of her compassionate-appointment claim should be set aside in light of the High Court’s earlier order and the State’s reconsideration of the claim

Source reference: pp.2–4, 6

2. Whether appointment could be directed subject to verification of the petitioner’s supporting documents

Source reference: pp.5–6
03

Law Applied

The claim arose under the Karnataka Civil Services (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 1996, which govern eligibility for compassionate appointment

Source reference: p.3

The Court also relied on its earlier order in the petitioner’s case, without setting out a separate legal test in this order

Source reference: p.3

The State undertook to reconsider the claim without relying on the criteria of “married daughter” and delay in application, and the Court made appointment conditional on verification of the petitioner’s documents

Source reference: pp.4–6
04

Reasoning

The original rejection rested on the absence of provision for appointing married daughters, despite the High Court’s earlier order concerning the petitioner

Source reference: p.3

Following the Court’s direction, the State withdrew the rejection and reported that it had reconsidered the claim without applying the married-daughter and delay criteria; it found the petitioner eligible, subject to verification of her documents

Source reference: pp.4–6

In light of that position, the Court set aside the Tribunal’s order and directed appointment after verification

Source reference: p.6
05

Holding

The Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the Tribunal’s order dated 16 December 2024 in Application No. 1995/2024

It directed the respondents to issue the petitioner an appointment order on compassionate grounds, subject to verification of her documents, within two months

Source reference: p.6
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT K R SHYLAJAvsSTATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · September 30, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment