Facts
The petitioner, appointed as a Lower Division Teacher in 1982 and later promoted as Head Master, was transferred to the Office of the Block Education Officer, Jashpur, on 30 July 2012.
Source reference: para. 1–2She alleged that, despite the transfer, she continued working at her original posting on oral directions and had not received salary for the disputed period or her pensionary and other retiral benefits.
Source reference: para. 1–2Her salary claim was rejected by an order dated 28 May 2024.
Source reference: para. 1–2In the writ petition, she sought release of her pensionary benefits and salary for the period from 30 July 2012 to 22 May 2018.
Source reference: para. 1–2The State informed the Court that pensionary benefits based on her actual qualifying service were being processed.
Source reference: para. 5Issues
Whether the respondent authorities should be directed to complete the settlement and release of the petitioner’s pensionary benefits based on her actual qualifying service within a specified period
Source reference: para. 2, 5Whether the petitioner’s claim for salary and other admissible benefits for the period from 30 July 2012 to 22 May 2018 should be determined in this petition or left for pursuit before an appropriate forum
Source reference: para. 2, 6Law Applied
The judgment does not cite any statute, rule, or precedent.
Source reference: para. 5–6It proceeds on the basis that pensionary benefits admissible according to the petitioner’s actual qualifying service should be processed and released, and that her separate salary claim may be pursued before an appropriate forum in accordance with law.
Source reference: para. 5–6Reasoning
The State’s reply stated that the petitioner’s pensionary benefits, calculated according to her actual qualifying service, were being processed, and the State and the Accountant General did not oppose the petitioner’s request for a direction fixing a timeline.
Source reference: para. 2–6The Court therefore directed completion of the settlement and release process within 100 days.
Source reference: para. 2–6As the petitioner sought liberty to pursue her disputed salary claim separately, the Court reserved her right to approach the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage, in accordance with law.
Source reference: para. 2–6Holding
The writ petition was disposed of.
The respondent authorities were directed to complete the settlement and release of the pensionary benefits admissible according to the petitioner’s actual qualifying service within 100 days of receiving a copy of the order.
Source reference: para. 5–7The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue her claim for salary and other admissible benefits for 30 July 2012 to 22 May 2018 before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law.
Source reference: para. 5–7Original Court PDF
SMT. VICTORIA LAKRA (BEFORE MARRIAGE KU. V. XAXA),vsTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
