Chhattisgarh High Court

Bail Denied for Providing Bank Account for Organized Cyber Fraud and Committing Transactions via Mule Accounts

RAMCHANDRA YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 28, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Ramchandra Yadav, was arrested on November 25, 2025, in connection with Crime No. 358/2025 involving an organized cyber fraud network

Source reference: p. 1, 2

Investigation revealed that the applicant’s bank account in the Bank of Maharashtra and Indian Overseas Bank were utilized as "mule accounts" to receive and dissipate illicit funds obtained through online fraud

Source reference: p. 1-3

Transaction details showed that approximately ₹39,104 was credited to his account from various states, including a specific complaint from a resident in Chennai involving ₹24,348

Source reference: p. 3-4

The applicant sought regular bail, arguing he had no direct role in the fraud, no recovery was made from him, and the charge-sheet had already been filed

Source reference: p. 2
02

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering his role as a mule account holder in an organized cybercrime

Source reference: p. 1 / para. 1
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023

Source reference: p. 1

Sections 111 (Organized Crime), 317(2) (Stolen Property), 371(4), and 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023

Source reference: p. 1, 5

The guiding principle applied was the gravity of the offense and the nature of the evidence in cases involving organized cybercrime, where the use of bank accounts to conceal or dispose of property obtained by fraud constitutes a serious threat to society

Source reference: p. 4-5
04

Reasoning

The Court evaluated the Investigating Officer's additional affidavit, which detailed that the applicant's account was opened shortly before fraudulent transactions commenced (opening date 11.11.2024)

Source reference: p. 4

The Court noted that the total credit of ₹39,104 was almost entirely debited (₹39,051), indicating the account was being used as a conduit for "mule" activities to facilitate illegal money laundering

Source reference: p. 4

Although the applicant argued there was no direct evidence of him committing the fraud, the Court found that the act of knowingly providing a bank account to a criminal gang to deposit and conceal "property obtained by dishonesty" linked him to the organized crime

Source reference: p. 3-4

Given the widespread impact of cyber fraud and the instrumental role the applicant played in deceiving innocent people, the Court held that the gravity of the allegations outweighed the fact that the applicant had no prior criminal record

Source reference: p. 4-5
05

Holding

The Court held that this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail due to the serious nature of the organized cybercrime and the evidence reflecting his participation as a mule account holder

The first bail application was rejected

Source reference: para. 7

The trial court was granted liberty to proceed with the trial expeditiously

Source reference: para. 8
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

RAMCHANDRA YADAVvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment