Chhattisgarh High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Bail Denied in Online Gambling Case Involving Organized Syndicate and Significant Linkage of Digital Evidence

PRAKASHCHAND MIRIv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Bail Denied in Online Gambling Case Involving Organized Syndicate and Significant Linkage of Digital Evidence. PRAKASHCHAND MIRI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the applicants are entitled to be released on bail under the Chhattisgarh Gambling Prohibition Act, 2022, considering the nature of electronic evidence and the duration of their custody.

The court held

The Court answered the issue in the negative, holding that the gravity of the offence and the applicants' direct involvement in an organized criminal network disentitled them to bail.

It also directed

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed MCRC No. 4058/2026, MCRC No. 4565/2026, and MCRC No. 4671/2026.

01Facts

The Police of New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, acting on secret information, intercepted a Baleno car on 25.02.2026.

p. 3

Two primary accused (Shaiky Darda and Prateek Vadhwani) were found engaged in online gambling on the 2020 Cricket World Cup match.

p. 3

Following their interrogation and memorandum statements, the present applicants—Prakashchand Miri, Dhananjay Kumar Vaishnav, Pramod Kumar Orke, and Saket Jagwani—were implicated in a larger gambling syndicate.

¶ 4

Police seized a significant quantity of hardware from the applicants, including 34 mobile phones, 3 laptops, and Wi-Fi routers.

¶ 4

The applicants were arrested on 28.02.2026 and filed their first bail applications after the charge-sheet was filed.

¶ 2, 5

02Issues

i.1. Whether the applicants are entitled to be released on bail under the Chhattisgarh Gambling Prohibition Act, 2022, considering the nature of electronic evidence and the duration of their custody.

p. 6 · ¶ 9

03Law Applied

Section 7 of the Chhattisgarh Gambling Prohibition Act, 2022, which penalizes online gambling, and Section 112(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶ 3

General principles governing bail under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), weighing the gravity of the offence, the organized nature of the crime, and the impact on the national economy against the individual's right to liberty during trial.

¶ 9

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 112

04Reasoning

The Court rejected the applicants’ contention that the evidence was solely based on inadmissible memorandum statements.

¶ 5-7

It reasoned that the seizure of 16 and 17 mobile phones from individual applicants, respectively, coupled with laptops and routers, prima facie established their role in a sophisticated syndicate.

¶ 4, 9

The Court noted that the interlinking of mobile numbers with numerous third-party bank accounts and ATM cards for money transactions substantiated the prosecution’s claim of an organized network.

¶ 7

The Judge emphasized that "online gambling is an organized crime" with "significant impact on the economy of the country," which outweighs the fact that the investigation was complete and the charge-sheet filed.

¶ 9

05Holding

The Court answered the issue in the negative, holding that the gravity of the offence and the applicants' direct involvement in an organized criminal network disentitled them to bail.

¶ 9

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed MCRC No. 4058/2026, MCRC No. 4565/2026, and MCRC No. 4671/2026.

¶ 10
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

PRAKASHCHAND MIRIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · June 19, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment