Chhattisgarh High Court

Bail Granted Despite Criminal Antecedents Where Charge-Sheet Is Filed and Trial Is Lengthy

RAZA KHAN @ SUTTI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Raza Khan, was arrested on November 4, 2025, following a report by complainant Krishna Bawankar alleging that the applicant demanded money for alcohol at Budheshwar Talab Garden, used filthy language, and assaulted him when he refused

Source reference: para 2

The applicant was charged under Sections 119(1) and 296 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023

Source reference: para 1

The applicant moved this First Bail Application, contending he was falsely implicated and noting that a charge-sheet had already been filed

Source reference: para 3

The State opposed the bail, citing five previous criminal antecedents involving the IPC and the Arms Act

Source reference: para 4
02

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, considering his criminal history and the nature of the alleged offense

Source reference: para 1, 6
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the High Court's power to grant bail

Source reference: para 1

Procedural conditions for the conduct of the trial were governed by Section 269 of the BNS regarding non-attendance, and Sections 84, 209, and 351 of the BNSS regarding proclamations for absconding persons, punishment for non-appearance, and recording of statements, respectively

Source reference: para 7
04

Reasoning

The Court balanced the gravity of the allegations against the procedural status of the case. It noted that while the applicant had five criminal antecedents, explanation for these was provided via a covering memo, and he had already secured an acquittal in one of those cases

Source reference: para 3, 6

The Court observed that the charge-sheet had already been filed, and the applicant had been in judicial custody since November 4, 2025

Source reference: para 6

Given that the trial was expected to take a considerable amount of time, the Court reasoned that further incarceration was not necessitated, provided that strict conditions were imposed to ensure the applicant’s presence and prevent the abuse of liberty

Source reference: para 6-7
05

Holding

The Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties

The holding is subject to specific conditions: the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments, must be present at every hearing, and must strictly adhere to procedural requirements under Sections 209, 269, and 351 of the BNSS/BNS, failing which the trial court may revoke the bail

Source reference: para 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

RAZA KHAN @ SUTTIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment