Chhattisgarh High Court

Bail granted for intermediate quantity of Ganja where no criminal antecedents exist and trial is pending.

SUMIT BEN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 28, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was arrested on September 4, 2025, in connection with Crime No. 269/2025 at Police Station Sarsiwa

Source reference: para. 1, 3

According to the prosecution, on September 3, 2025, the applicant and a co-accused were caught transporting 13 kg 330 grams of Ganja in eight packets on a scooty near Gram Bhinoda

Source reference: para. 2

Following the investigation, a charge-sheet was filed for offences under Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act

Source reference: para. 1–2

The applicant filed this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking regular bail

Source reference: para. 1
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail considering the quantity of the seized contraband and his period of incarceration

Source reference: para. 3, 6
03

Law Applied

The court applied Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act, 1985, which penalizes the production, manufacture, possession, sale, purchase, and transport of cannabis

Source reference: para. 1

Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which stipulates stringent conditions for bail in cases involving "commercial quantities" (defined as over 20 kg for Ganja in the Schedule)

Source reference: para. 3

The application was governed by Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the power of the High Court to grant bail

Source reference: para. 1
04

Reasoning

The Court observed that the total quantity of Ganja seized from the joint possession of the applicant and the co-accused was 13 kg 330 grams.

Source reference: para. 6

Since this amount is less than the 20 kg threshold for a "commercial quantity," the Court held that the rigorous bail restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act do not apply

Source reference: para. 3, 6

The Court took note of the fact that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the applicant had no criminal antecedents in the State of Madhya Pradesh, and he had been in custody since September 4, 2025

Source reference: para. 4, 6

Given that the trial was expected to take considerable time, the Court found the applicant eligible for release

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The holding clarified that since the seized contraband was of "intermediate quantity," the statutory bar on bail was not attracted

The Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on personal bond with two local sureties

Source reference: para. 7

The release is subject to conditions, including non-seeking of adjournments, mandatory presence during trial stages (citing Section 269 and 351 of BNSS), and trial consequences for absconding under Section 84 and 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SUMIT BENvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment