Facts
The applicant was arrested on September 4, 2025, in connection with Crime No. 269/2025 at Police Station Sarsiwa
Source reference: para. 1, 3According to the prosecution, on September 3, 2025, the applicant and a co-accused were caught transporting 13 kg 330 grams of Ganja in eight packets on a scooty near Gram Bhinoda
Source reference: para. 2Following the investigation, a charge-sheet was filed for offences under Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act
Source reference: para. 1–2The applicant filed this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking regular bail
Source reference: para. 1Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail considering the quantity of the seized contraband and his period of incarceration
Source reference: para. 3, 6Law Applied
The court applied Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act, 1985, which penalizes the production, manufacture, possession, sale, purchase, and transport of cannabis
Source reference: para. 1Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which stipulates stringent conditions for bail in cases involving "commercial quantities" (defined as over 20 kg for Ganja in the Schedule)
Source reference: para. 3The application was governed by Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the power of the High Court to grant bail
Source reference: para. 1Reasoning
The Court observed that the total quantity of Ganja seized from the joint possession of the applicant and the co-accused was 13 kg 330 grams.
Source reference: para. 6Since this amount is less than the 20 kg threshold for a "commercial quantity," the Court held that the rigorous bail restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act do not apply
Source reference: para. 3, 6The Court took note of the fact that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the applicant had no criminal antecedents in the State of Madhya Pradesh, and he had been in custody since September 4, 2025
Source reference: para. 4, 6Given that the trial was expected to take considerable time, the Court found the applicant eligible for release
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The holding clarified that since the seized contraband was of "intermediate quantity," the statutory bar on bail was not attracted
The Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on personal bond with two local sureties
Source reference: para. 7The release is subject to conditions, including non-seeking of adjournments, mandatory presence during trial stages (citing Section 269 and 351 of BNSS), and trial consequences for absconding under Section 84 and 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
SUMIT BENvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in