Madhya Pradesh High Court

Bail granted for Section 49A M.P. Excise offence subject to automatic cancellation upon poisonous FSL findings.

Rajesh Chouhan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 07, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Rajesh Chouhan, filed his first application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS).

Source reference: p.1

He was arrested on February 19, 2026, in connection with Crime No. 58/2026 for an offense under Section 49A of the M.P. Excise Act.

Source reference: p.1

According to the prosecution, police intercepted the applicant near Garot Bridge based on secret information and recovered five bulk liters of country-made raw liquor suspected to be unfit for human consumption.

Source reference: p.2

The applicant has been in judicial custody since the date of arrest.

Source reference: p.1

The defense contended that the applicant was falsely implicated on suspicion, no expert opinion was yet available to prove the liquor was unfit for consumption, and the FSL report remained awaited.

Source reference: p.1-2
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS considering the nature of the seizure and the lack of criminal antecedents.

Source reference: p.2

2. Whether continued incarceration is warranted when the FSL report is pending and the offense is triable by a Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC).

Source reference: p.2-3
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which governs the High Court's power to grant bail.

Source reference: p.1

Section 49A of the M.P. Excise Act, which penalizes the possession or sale of liquor unfit for human consumption.

Source reference: p.1

General principles of criminal jurisprudence regarding bail, specifically examining the likelihood of recidivism, the risk of the accused fleeing from justice, and the socio-economic status of the applicant as an agriculturist with no prior criminal record.

Source reference: p.2-3
04

Reasoning

The Court observed that the applicant is a 26-year-old agriculturist with no reported criminal antecedents.

Source reference: p.2

While the prosecution opposed bail based on the gravity of the offense, the Court noted that the quantity seized was relatively small (five bulk liters) and the chemical analysis (FSL) report required to prove the liquor was "unfit for human consumption" under Section 49A was still awaited.

Source reference: p.2

The Court found merit in the applicant’s argument that the veracity of the prosecution's claims could only be determined during the trial.

Source reference: p.2

Furthermore, given the applicant's socio-economic background and responsibilities toward his family, the Court found no evidence suggesting he would flee or tamper with evidence.

Source reference: p.2-3

It concluded that there was no compelling reason to continue his incarceration during the trial, which is to be conducted by a JMFC.

Source reference: p.3
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the application and directed the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of the same amount.

The bail is subject to several conditions, including regular attendance at hearings and a prohibition against committing similar offenses.

Source reference: p.3-4

Notably, the Court imposed a specific condition that if the FSL report reveals any poisonous substance in the seized liquor, the bail order shall stand cancelled automatically without further reference to the Court, and the applicant must surrender immediately.

Source reference: p.4
Madhya Pradesh High Court

Original Court PDF

Rajesh ChouhanvsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · April 07, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment