Chhattisgarh High Court

Bail Granted on Grounds of Parity and Completion of Investigation Despite Criminal Antecedents

ABHISHEK PRADHAN ALIAS CHHOTE NANKI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: May 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

According to the prosecution, on November 10, 2025, the complainant was intercepted by 4–5 unknown intoxicated individuals who dragged him toward a railway line, assaulted him, and forcibly took his mobile phone and cash

Source reference: para. 2

An FIR was registered against unknown persons on November 12, 2025

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant was arrested on February 6, 2026, and a charge sheet has since been filed

Source reference: paras. 2-3

The applicant argued for bail on the grounds of parity with a co-accused and the fact that he was not named in the initial FIR

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, based on the principle of parity and the completion of the investigation

Source reference: para. 1, 6
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the power to grant bail

Source reference: para. 1

The court adhered to the principle of parity in bail jurisprudence, referencing its earlier order in Deepanshu Kumar Rathore v. State of Chhattisgarh (MCRC No. 617/2026)

Source reference: para. 3, 6

Sections 310(2), 126(2), 115(2), 351(3), 338, 308(2), and 111(2)(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023

Source reference: para. 1, 7
04

Reasoning

The Court examined the nature of the allegations and noted that the FIR was originally lodged against unknown persons, meaning the applicant was not specifically identified at the initial stage

Source reference: para. 3

While the State Counsel pointed out two previous criminal antecedents, the Court observed that these had been documented and explained by the applicant’s counsel

Source reference: para. 3-4

Crucially, the Court found that a co-accused, Deepanshu Kumar Rathore, had already been granted bail on March 11, 2026. Given that the investigation was complete and the charge sheet had been filed, the Court reasoned that continued incarceration was unnecessary and that the applicant qualified for relief on the ground of parity

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The Court allowed the bail application, answering the issue in the affirmative

The Court ordered the release of the applicant upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, subject to several conditions: (i) the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments; (ii) the applicant must attend all trial dates; and (iii) any violation of bail conditions or failure to appear may result in proceedings under Sections 269 and 209 of the BNS

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

ABHISHEK PRADHAN ALIAS CHHOTE NANKIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · May 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment