Facts
The applicant was arrested on February 24, 2026, following a police raid at her residence in Village Mudpar-Barari, where 42 bulk litres of illicit liquor were allegedly seized.
Source reference: para. 2A case was registered under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.
Source reference: para. 1The applicant approached the High Court for regular bail, contending she was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and that the investigation was complete with the filing of the charge-sheet.
Source reference: para. 3The State opposed the application but confirmed the absence of criminal antecedents and the completion of the charge-sheet.
Source reference: para. 4Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, considering the nature of the offence and her criminal history.
Source reference: para. 1, 6Law Applied
The court applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the power of the High Court to grant bail.
Source reference: para. 1Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, noting the prescribed punishment ranges from a minimum of one year to a maximum of three years.
Source reference: para. 3The court also referenced Sections 269, 84, 209, and 351 of the BNS/BNSS to stipulate conditions for maintaining the liberty of bail and ensuring the applicant's presence during trial.
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The Court evaluated the necessity of continued incarceration against the backdrop of the "bail is the rule, jail is the exception" principle.
Source reference: para. 6It observed that the investigation had concluded with the filing of the charge-sheet, and the applicant had been in custody since February 24, 2026.
Source reference: para. 6Key to the court’s reasoning was the fact that the applicant had no previous criminal antecedents.
Source reference: para. 6Furthermore, the Court noted that given the maximum potential sentence is three years and the trial is likely to be protracted, continued detention was not warranted.
Source reference: para. 3, 6The court balanced the State's concerns by imposing stringent procedural conditions to ensure the applicant does not misuse her liberty or delay the trial.
Source reference: para. 7Holding
The Court answered the issue in the affirmative and allowed the bail application.
The applicant was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including: appearing on all trial dates, not seeking unnecessary adjournments, and appearing personally for the framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 of BNSS.
Source reference: para. 7The Court warned that any default or misuse of liberty would allow the trial court to proceed under Sections 209 and 269 of the BNS.
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
CHANDRIKA NISHADvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in