Facts
The applicant, Munat Yadav, filed a First Bail Application seeking release from custody in connection with Crime No. 21/2026.
Source reference: para 1The prosecution alleged that the applicant and co-accused used abusive language and threatened to kill the injured, Tularam Sahu.
Source reference: para 2While the applicant was accused of verbal abuse and threats, the co-accused, Sahil Yadav, allegedly inflicted three knife wounds on the victim’s back and caused head injuries using a bangle (chuda).
Source reference: para 2The applicant was arrested on January 28, 2026, and remained in jail while the charge-sheet was subsequently filed.
Source reference: para 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering his specific role in the offense and the stage of the trial.
Source reference: para 1, 6Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, governing the grant of regular bail.
Source reference: para 1The principle that bail should be considered based on the nature and gravity of the allegations, the specific role of the accused, and the likelihood of the trial's duration.
Source reference: para 6Procedural consequences for the abuse of liberty under Sections 209 and 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 84 of the BNSS regarding proclamations for absconding persons.
Source reference: para 7Reasoning
The Court observed that the applicant's role was distinct from the co-accused who inflicted life-threatening physical injuries with a weapon.
Source reference: para 6The primary allegation against the applicant was limited to the use of abusive language and threats, with no evidence of physical assault attributed to him.
Source reference: para 3, 6The court noted that the applicant was implicated solely based on a memorandum statement of a co-accused and had no prior criminal record.
Source reference: para 3, 4Since the charge-sheet had already been filed and the trial was expected to take a considerable amount of time, the Court determined that continued incarceration was unnecessary, provided strict conditions were met to ensure his presence during trial proceedings.
Source reference: para 6, 7Holding
The lack of physical participation in the assault and the absence of criminal antecedents favored the applicant's release.
The Court allowed the bail application, granting regular bail to Munat Yadav upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties subject to conditions: the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments, must appear at all critical trial stages, and must comply with Section 351 of the BNSS.
Source reference: para 7Original Court PDF
MUNAT YADAVvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in