Chhattisgarh High Court

Bail may be granted under Excise Act where charge-sheet is filed and criminal antecedents are duly explained.

DHANARAM YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 21, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Dhanaram Yadav, was arrested on January 7, 2026, following a police raid based on secret information that led to the seizure of 10 litres of handmade liquor from his possession

Source reference: para. 2, 3

He was charged under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act in Crime No. 03/2026 at Police Station Saragaon

Source reference: para. 1

The applicant moved the High Court for regular bail, contending false implication and noting that while he had three previous disposed-of criminal cases and one pending excise case, the charge-sheet in the present matter had already been filed

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering the nature of the offence and the period of incarceration

Source reference: para. 1, 6
03

Law Applied

The Court applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, governing the High Court's power to grant bail

Source reference: para. 1

Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, which prescribes a punishment ranging from one to three years

Source reference: para. 3

procedural compliance under the BNSS, specifically Section 269 (non-appearance), Section 84 (proclamation for person absconding), Section 209 (failure to appear in violation of proclamation), and Section 351 (recording of statement)

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The Court examined the gravity of the allegations alongside the procedural status of the case. It noted that the investigation was effectively complete as the charge-sheet had already been filed

Source reference: para. 6

The Court balanced the applicant’s criminal antecedents—which were explained via a covering memo—against the fact that he had been in judicial custody since early January 2026

Source reference: para. 6

Given that the maximum sentence for the offence is three years and the trial was expected to take a considerable amount of time, the Court determined that continued pretrial detention was unnecessary, provided stringent conditions were imposed to ensure the applicant's presence during trial

Source reference: para. 3, 6, 7
05

Holding

The Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on a personal bond with two sureties

The holding is contingent upon strict conditions: the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments, must be present for all key trial stages (framing of charges and Section 351 BNSS statements), and any violation regarding appearance will be treated as an abuse of liberty under Sections 209 and 269 of the BNS/BNSS

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

DHANARAM YADAVvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 21, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment