Chhattisgarh High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Bail may be refused in light of the victim’s minority and serious sexual-assault allegations.

ANKUSH KORE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 01, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Bail may be refused in light of the victim’s minority and serious sexual-assault allegations.. ANKUSH KORE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87 and 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act)

Source reference: para. 1

The prosecution alleged that the victim’s father reported her missing on 22 April 2026; she was recovered with the applicant in Nagpur on 27 May 2026.

Source reference: paras. 2–5

In her statement under Section 183 of the BNSS, she alleged repeated sexual assault and pregnancy.

Source reference: paras. 2–5

The applicant relied on an alleged relationship, completion of the investigation, filing of the charge-sheet, and his custody since 27 May 2026.

Source reference: paras. 2–5

The State opposed bail, citing the victim’s age—17 years and 7 months—and the allegations; her father also objected

Source reference: paras. 2–5
02

Issues

Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, having regard to the victim’s age and the allegations against him

Source reference: paras. 3–7

Whether the completion of the investigation, filing of the charge-sheet, and the applicant’s period in custody warranted release on bail

Source reference: paras. 3, 6–7
03

Law Applied

The application was made under Section 483 of the BNSS, which provides the procedural basis for seeking regular bail

Source reference: para. 1

The alleged offences were under Sections 137(2), 87 and 64(2)(m) of the BNS and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act

Source reference: para. 1

The order does not set out a further statutory bail test, discuss precedents, or articulate a general legal rule; it records that the Court considered the nature and gravity of the offence, the victim’s age, and her allegations

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the competing submissions, the case diary, and the material on record

Source reference: paras. 3–6

Although the applicant relied on the completed investigation, the filed charge-sheet, and the likely duration of trial, the Court found the nature and gravity of the allegations, the victim’s age, and her statement under Section 183 of the BNSS decisive against release.

Source reference: paras. 3, 6–7

It therefore declined bail without separately analysing the applicant’s claim of a consensual relationship or elaborating on the applicable statutory bail principles

Source reference: paras. 3, 6–7
05

Holding

The Court answered the bail question in the negative

rejected Ankush Kore’s application for regular bail in connection with Crime No. 67/2026, Police Station Devri, District Balod

Source reference: para. 8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

7 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20232

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20233

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 20122

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

ANKUSH KOREvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 01, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment