Facts
The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87 and 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act)
Source reference: para. 1The prosecution alleged that the victim’s father reported her missing on 22 April 2026; she was recovered with the applicant in Nagpur on 27 May 2026.
Source reference: paras. 2–5In her statement under Section 183 of the BNSS, she alleged repeated sexual assault and pregnancy.
Source reference: paras. 2–5The applicant relied on an alleged relationship, completion of the investigation, filing of the charge-sheet, and his custody since 27 May 2026.
Source reference: paras. 2–5The State opposed bail, citing the victim’s age—17 years and 7 months—and the allegations; her father also objected
Source reference: paras. 2–5Issues
Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, having regard to the victim’s age and the allegations against him
Source reference: paras. 3–7Whether the completion of the investigation, filing of the charge-sheet, and the applicant’s period in custody warranted release on bail
Source reference: paras. 3, 6–7Law Applied
The application was made under Section 483 of the BNSS, which provides the procedural basis for seeking regular bail
Source reference: para. 1The alleged offences were under Sections 137(2), 87 and 64(2)(m) of the BNS and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act
Source reference: para. 1The order does not set out a further statutory bail test, discuss precedents, or articulate a general legal rule; it records that the Court considered the nature and gravity of the offence, the victim’s age, and her allegations
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The Court considered the competing submissions, the case diary, and the material on record
Source reference: paras. 3–6Although the applicant relied on the completed investigation, the filed charge-sheet, and the likely duration of trial, the Court found the nature and gravity of the allegations, the victim’s age, and her statement under Section 183 of the BNSS decisive against release.
Source reference: paras. 3, 6–7It therefore declined bail without separately analysing the applicant’s claim of a consensual relationship or elaborating on the applicable statutory bail principles
Source reference: paras. 3, 6–7Holding
The Court answered the bail question in the negative
rejected Ankush Kore’s application for regular bail in connection with Crime No. 67/2026, Police Station Devri, District Balod
Source reference: para. 8Acts & Sections Cited
7 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20232
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20233
Original Court PDF
ANKUSH KOREvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
