Chhattisgarh High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Bank employees accused of cheque tampering granted anticipatory bail.

HITESH SALUJA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 12, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Bank employees accused of cheque tampering granted anticipatory bail.. HITESH SALUJA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicants, employees of the District Cooperative Central Bank, Bilaspur, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No. 512/2026, registered for offences under Sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Source reference: para. 1

The complaint alleged that three cheques issued by Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Guma, were altered to increase their amounts, causing an alleged misappropriation of ₹3,38,000; the Samiti’s manager was alleged to have withdrawn the increased amounts

Source reference: para. 2

The applicants denied involvement, asserting that the Society prepared and approved the cheques and its employees withdrew the funds.

Source reference: para. 3

The State opposed bail, noting that the investigation was ongoing and a handwriting-expert report was awaited.

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

Whether the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 512/2026

Source reference: paras. 1, 7–8
03

Law Applied

The Court considered the application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which provides the procedural basis invoked for anticipatory bail.

Source reference: para. 1

The alleged offences were under Sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Source reference: para. 1

The order states no further statutory test, precedent, or general bail principle; the Court recorded that it had considered the facts, circumstances, nature of the allegations, and parties’ submissions without commenting on the merits.

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the applicants’ denial of involvement and their status as bank employees, alongside the State’s submission that the investigation remained underway and the handwriting-expert report was pending.

Source reference: paras. 3–4

Without expressing any view on the merits, it found the circumstances sufficient to grant anticipatory bail.

Source reference: para. 7

The order does not provide a more detailed assessment of the applicants’ individual roles or the pending forensic evidence.

Source reference: para. 7
05

Holding

The Court allowed the application

if arrested in Crime No. 512/2026, each applicant be released on anticipatory bail upon executing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer

Source reference: para. 8

The applicants must remain available for interrogation, refrain from influencing persons acquainted with the case, avoid conduct prejudicial to a fair and expeditious trial, and attend court on each date fixed until disposal of the trial.

Source reference: para. 8

A certified copy was directed to be sent to the trial court for information and compliance.

Source reference: para. 9
06

Acts & Sections Cited

6 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

HITESH SALUJAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment