Central Administrative Tribunal
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Cadre-origin posts designated as deputation reserve for allied institutions maintain seniority within the parent medical college cadre.

DR HARLEEN KOUR vs HEALTH AND MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

Central Administrative TribunalJUDGMENT: April 27, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Cadre-origin posts designated as deputation reserve for allied institutions maintain seniority within the parent medical college cadre.. DR HARLEEN KOUR vs HEALTH AND MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT. Central Administrative Tribunal. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Dr. Harleen Kour, was appointed as a Lecturer in Microbiology at Government Medical College (GMC), Jammu, on 21.01.2011

Source reference: p. 4, 12

She challenged the final seniority list dated 23.03.2011, which placed Respondent No. 5, Dr. Sandeep Dogra, above her in the GMC Jammu cadre

Source reference: p. 3

The applicant contended that Dr. Dogra was recruited against posts created for Indira Gandhi Government Dental College (IGGDC) vide Government Order (G.O.) No. 604-HME of 2007, and was merely on deputation to GMC Jammu

Source reference: p. 4-6

G.O. No. 103-HME of 2008 formally included these posts in the GMC cadre as "deputation reserve posts"

Source reference: p. 9

Dr. Dogra was appointed to GMC Jammu on 17.12.2009—prior to the applicant—following a PSC notification that identified the post as belonging to the Medical College cadre

Source reference: p. 10, 14
02

Issues

1. Whether Respondent No. 5 was appointed to a post borne on the cadre of GMC Jammu or remained a substantive member of the Dental College cadre

Source reference: p. 12-13

2. Whether the seniority of Respondent No. 5 was correctly fixed above the applicant based on his earlier date of appointment to a deputation reserve post encadred in GMC Jammu

Source reference: p. 14-16
03

Law Applied

The court applied the principle that seniority is a function of the specific cadre post and the date of substantive appointment to that cadre

Source reference: p. 6, 20

The court applied the principle of finality in service matters, as established in related proceedings (O.A. No. 985/2023), holding that settled service rights and departmental interpretations acted upon over long periods should not be disturbed unless there is patent nullity

Source reference: p. 16-18

It relied on the administrative doctrine governing "deputation reserve" arrangements, where a post operated for a different institutional purpose (e.g., teaching dental students) maintains its cadre control and service consequences within the parent establishment (GMC)

Source reference: p. 15-16
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that G.O. No. 541-HME of 2008 and G.O. No. 103-HME of 2008 effectively merged the disputed Microbiology posts into the GMC Jammu/Srinagar cadre strength as deputation reserve posts

Source reference: p. 9, 15

The PSC requisition and the subsequent appointment order for Respondent No. 5 dated 17.12.2009 explicitly treated the post as part of the Medical Education side rather than the Dental Education side

Source reference: p. 15

The Tribunal reasoned that administrative formalities—such as routing salary through the Dental College—did not alter the legal character of the post

Source reference: p. 15

Referencing a common judgment involving the same parties, the Tribunal noted that the department had consistently operationalized Dr. Dogra’s promotions and seniority within GMC for over a decade; therefore, the applicant's attempt to re-interpret the service structure years later was insufficient to unsettle established rights

Source reference: p. 16-19
05

Holding

The Tribunal dismissed the Transfer Application, holding that Respondent No. 5 was validly appointed to the GMC Jammu cadre earlier than the applicant

As seniority follows the date of appointment to the cadre post, the inclusion of Respondent No. 5 above the applicant in the 2011 seniority list was legally sound

Source reference: p. 20

The prayer to quash the seniority list was denied, and no costs were awarded

Source reference: p. 20
Central Administrative Tribunal

Original Court PDF

DR HARLEEN KOURvsHEALTH AND MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

Central Administrative Tribunal · April 27, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment