Allahabad High Court
Administrative and Public LawEmployment and Labour Law

Cancellation of absorption without reasons or hearing violates natural justice and is invalid.

Dhirendra Singh vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Medical Edu. Lko

Allahabad High CourtJUDGMENT: October 06, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Cancellation of absorption without reasons or hearing violates natural justice and is invalid.. Dhirendra Singh vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Medical Edu. Lko. Allahabad High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner was engaged as a daily-wage Junior Clerk in 1992.

Source reference: paras. 3–6, 8–12, 15, pp. 1–4

After litigation concerning his service, he received the minimum of the applicable pay scale from 7 February 2005.

Source reference: paras. 3–6, 8–12, 15, pp. 1–4

Two employees engaged after him were absorbed retrospectively, and the petitioner was later absorbed against a vacant Junior Assistant post by order dated 10 January 2014, following a committee recommendation.

Source reference: paras. 3–6, 8–12, 15, pp. 1–4

On 7 November 2014, the respondents cancelled his absorption without prior notice or hearing.

Source reference: paras. 3–6, 8–12, 15, pp. 1–4

He challenged that order, alleging that it gave no reasons and violated natural justice.

Source reference: paras. 3–6, 8–12, 15, pp. 1–4
02

Issues

Whether the cancellation of the petitioner’s absorption was invalid for failure to state reasons.

Source reference: paras. 19, 24–25, p. 4

Whether cancellation without notice or an opportunity of hearing violated the principles of natural justice.

Source reference: paras. 19, 21, 25–26, pp. 4–5
03

Law Applied

The Court referred to the Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Persons Working on Daily Wages or on Work Charge or on Contract in Government Departments on Group “C” and Group “D” Posts (Outside the Purview of the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission) Rules, 2016, observing that the impugned order did not identify any provision of those Rules that the petitioner had failed to satisfy.

Source reference: para. 24, p. 5

The Court applied the principles that administrative orders must disclose reasons and that a decision adversely affecting a person’s service position must comply with natural justice by providing notice and an opportunity of hearing.

Source reference: paras. 25–26, p. 5
04

Reasoning

The cancellation order stated that the petitioner did not fulfil the absorption requirements but did not specify the applicable provision or explain the basis for that conclusion. The Court therefore treated it as unreasoned.

Source reference: paras. 24–26, p. 5

It also found that the petitioner had not been given notice or a hearing before his absorption was cancelled; the relevant pleading was not denied in the counter-affidavit. These defects made the order both unreasoned and contrary to natural justice.

Source reference: paras. 24–26, p. 5
05

Holding

The Court held that the order dated 7 November 2014 was unsustainable because it was unreasoned and violated the principles of natural justice.

It set the order aside, allowed the writ petition, and made no order as to costs.

Source reference: paras. 27–29, p. 5
Allahabad High Court

Original Court PDF

Dhirendra SinghvsState Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Medical Edu. Lko

Allahabad High Court · October 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment