Facts
The petitioner, a Primary Agriculture Co-operative Credit Society (PACS), challenged the order dated 16.02.2023 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO), Rajauli, Nawada. This order cancelled the petitioner’s Public Distribution System (PDS) license (No. 342/2017) following directions from the Commissioner, Magadh Division
Source reference: p. 1-2The petitioner sought the restoration of the license and the resumption of essential supplies
Source reference: p. 2Both parties conceded that the legal controversy was identical to a previously adjudicated matter involving another PACS
Source reference: para. 2Issues
1. Whether the cancellation of the petitioner’s PDS license by the Sub-Divisional Officer at the direction of a superior authority was sustainable in law
Source reference: para. 2/42. Whether the petitioner is entitled to restoration of the license and supply based on the precedent set in Lodipur Panchayat PACS v. The State of Bihar
Source reference: para. 2/4Law Applied
The court applied the principle of stare decisis and administrative fairness.
Source reference: para. 3, 5The court relied on the precedent established in Lodipur Panchayat PACS vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. (C.W.J.C. No. 15893 of 2025), which held that while a license may be restored to a Society, the specific individual responsible for irregularities found during an inspection must be barred from managing the shop.
Source reference: para. 3, 5Reasoning
The court noted that the issues involved in the present writ petition were no longer res integra (an untouched matter) as they were squarely covered by the decision in Lodipur Panchayat PACS.
Source reference: para. 2By applying the logic of the cited precedent, the court found that the impugned order of cancellation dated 16.02.2023 was liable to be set aside.
Source reference: para. 4The court reasoned that while the corporate entity (the PACS) should have its license restored to maintain public supply, administrative integrity must be preserved by ensuring that the person who was in charge during the discovery of irregularities does not resume operations.
Source reference: para. 5Holding
The court allowed the writ petition and set aside the SDO’s order dated 16.02.2023.
Respondent No. 4 was directed to restore the petitioner's license and resume supplies within four weeks. The holding clarifies that the person running the shop at the time of inspection cannot continue; the Society must nominate a new individual to manage the PDS shop.
Source reference: para. 4, 5-6All pending interlocutory applications were disposed of accordingly.
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
Rasalpura Primary Agriculture Co-operative Credit Society, Nandsena, Meskaour, NalandavsThe State of Bihar
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in