01Facts
The 45 applicants, employees of Ordnance Factory, Katni, had submitted representations dated 10/11 September 2026 to the Executive Director, Ordnance Factory, Katni (respondent no. 4) seeking redress of their grievances.
p. 5 · ¶ 1–2Their counsel stated that the applicants would be satisfied if the Tribunal directed respondent no. 4 to decide those representations. The respondents opposed that request.
p. 5 · ¶ 1–202Issues
i.Whether respondent no. 4 should be directed to decide the applicants’ representations dated 10/11 September 2026 by a reasoned and speaking order within a specified period.
p. 5 · ¶ 1–3ii.Whether the Tribunal should express any view on the merits of the applicants’ underlying claims at this stage.
p. 5 · ¶ 603Law Applied
The order cites no statute, regulation, or precedent.
p. 5 · ¶ 3, 6It applies the procedural principle that, where the applicants seek only a direction for consideration of pending representations, the competent authority may be directed to decide them by a reasoned and speaking order within a specified time. Such a direction does not determine the merits of the underlying claims.
p. 5 · ¶ 3, 604Reasoning
The Tribunal treated the applicants’ request as an “innocuous” one and directed the authority to consider the representations rather than adjudicating the underlying grievance.
p. 5 · ¶ 3It required the applicants to provide respondent no. 4 with a copy of the order and the OA with its annexures, and required the authority to communicate its decision to them. The Tribunal expressly left the merits open.
p. 5 · ¶ 3, 605Holding
The OA was disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 4 to decide the representations dated 10/11 September 2026 by a reasoned and speaking order within 60 days of receiving a certified copy of the order.
p. 5 · ¶ 3–6The applicants must submit the order and the OA with annexures to respondent no. 4, and a copy of the decision must be communicated to them forthwith.
p. 5 · ¶ 3–6There was no order as to costs, and the Tribunal expressed no view on the merits.
p. 5 · ¶ 3–6Original Court PDF
NARENDRA BHARATvsDEFENCE PRODUCTION
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![CAT Directs Katni Ordnance Factory Executive Director To Decide 45 Employees’ Representations Within 60 Days of Receiving Order. NARENDRA BHARAT vs DEFENCE PRODUCTION. CAT - ['Jabalpur']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/cat-directs-katni-ordnance-factory-executive-director-to-decide-45-employees-representatio-99c99a25677d48408f550220f4dec220.webp)