CAT - ['Jabalpur']Administrative and Public LawEmployment and Labour Law

CAT Directs Katni Ordnance Factory Executive Director To Decide 45 Employees’ Representations Within 60 Days of Receiving Order

NARENDRA BHARATv.DEFENCE PRODUCTION

CAT Directs Katni Ordnance Factory Executive Director To Decide 45 Employees’ Representations Within 60 Days of Receiving Order. NARENDRA BHARAT vs DEFENCE PRODUCTION. CAT - ['Jabalpur']. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether respondent no. 4 should be directed to decide the applicants’ representations dated 10/11 September 2026 by a reasoned and speaking order within a specified period.

The court held

The OA was disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 4 to decide the representations dated 10/11 September 2026 by a reasoned and speaking order within 60 days of receiving a certified copy of the order.

It also directed

The applicants must submit the order and the OA with annexures to respondent no. 4, and a copy of the decision must be communicated to them forthwith.

There was no order as to costs, and the Tribunal expressed no view on the merits.

01Facts

The 45 applicants, employees of Ordnance Factory, Katni, had submitted representations dated 10/11 September 2026 to the Executive Director, Ordnance Factory, Katni (respondent no. 4) seeking redress of their grievances.

p. 5 · ¶ 1–2

Their counsel stated that the applicants would be satisfied if the Tribunal directed respondent no. 4 to decide those representations. The respondents opposed that request.

p. 5 · ¶ 1–2

02Issues

i.Whether respondent no. 4 should be directed to decide the applicants’ representations dated 10/11 September 2026 by a reasoned and speaking order within a specified period.

p. 5 · ¶ 1–3

ii.Whether the Tribunal should express any view on the merits of the applicants’ underlying claims at this stage.

p. 5 · ¶ 6

03Law Applied

The order cites no statute, regulation, or precedent.

p. 5 · ¶ 3, 6

It applies the procedural principle that, where the applicants seek only a direction for consideration of pending representations, the competent authority may be directed to decide them by a reasoned and speaking order within a specified time. Such a direction does not determine the merits of the underlying claims.

p. 5 · ¶ 3, 6

04Reasoning

The Tribunal treated the applicants’ request as an “innocuous” one and directed the authority to consider the representations rather than adjudicating the underlying grievance.

p. 5 · ¶ 3

It required the applicants to provide respondent no. 4 with a copy of the order and the OA with its annexures, and required the authority to communicate its decision to them. The Tribunal expressly left the merits open.

p. 5 · ¶ 3, 6

05Holding

The OA was disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 4 to decide the representations dated 10/11 September 2026 by a reasoned and speaking order within 60 days of receiving a certified copy of the order.

p. 5 · ¶ 3–6

The applicants must submit the order and the OA with annexures to respondent no. 4, and a copy of the decision must be communicated to them forthwith.

p. 5 · ¶ 3–6

There was no order as to costs, and the Tribunal expressed no view on the merits.

p. 5 · ¶ 3–6
CAT - ['Jabalpur']

Original Court PDF

NARENDRA BHARATvsDEFENCE PRODUCTION

CAT - ['Jabalpur'] · October 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment