01Facts
The applicant, a Senior Nursing Officer at AIIMS Rishikesh, had served in the Military Nursing Service in the commissioned rank of Major.
p. 3 · ¶ 3–4She sought protection of her previous military pay on appointment, relying on the CCS (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986 and DoPT’s Office Memorandum dated 1 May 2017.
p. 3 · ¶ 3After submitting a representation dated 10 April 2026, she approached the Tribunal when it remained undecided.
p. 3 · ¶ 3–4The respondents stated that the representation had been forwarded to the competent authority and would be considered under the applicable rules.
p. 4 · ¶ 502Issues
i.1. Whether the competent authority should be directed to consider and decide the applicant’s pending representation concerning pay fixation under the applicable re-employment rules.
p. 4 · ¶ 6–7ii.2. Whether the Tribunal should determine the applicant’s substantive entitlement to pay protection or revise her pay fixation at this stage.
pp. 3–4 · ¶ 3–703Law Applied
Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 provides the basis for invoking the Tribunal’s jurisdiction.
p. 2 · ¶ 2The CCS (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986, and DoPT’s Office Memorandum dated 1 May 2017 were identified as relevant to the applicant’s claim; however, the Tribunal did not interpret or determine the substantive effect of those provisions.
p. 3 · ¶ 3 · p. 4 · ¶ 7The Tribunal directed that the representation be decided by a reasoned and speaking order, referring to the principles of natural justice.
p. 4 · ¶ 7Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Section 19
04Reasoning
The Tribunal did not adjudicate whether the applicant was entitled to pay protection or whether her pay had been correctly fixed.
p. 3 · ¶ 4 · p. 4 · ¶ 6–7The applicant accepted that the immediate relief sought could be met by a direction to decide her representation, while the respondents confirmed that it had been forwarded to the competent authority.
p. 3 · ¶ 4 · p. 4 · ¶ 5In light of those submissions, and without expressing any opinion on the merits, the Tribunal required the competent authority to consider the claim under the applicable rules and issue a reasoned order within a specified period.
p. 4 · ¶ 6–705Holding
The Tribunal directed the competent authority to decide the applicant’s representation dated 10 April 2026 by a reasoned and speaking order, in light of the CCS (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986, within four weeks of receiving a certified copy of the order.
p. 4 · ¶ 7If the decision favoured the applicant, her pay and any arrears were to be disbursed; if not, she remained at liberty to pursue remedies in accordance with law.
pp. 4–5 · ¶ 8The O.A. was disposed of at the admission stage, with no order as to costs.
p. 5 · ¶ 9–11Original Court PDF
Major Rekha RanivsHEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![CAT Sets Four-Week Deadline To Decide AIIMS Nursing Officer’s Plea To Protect Her Military-Service Pay. Major Rekha Rani vs HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE. CAT - ['Delhi']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/cat-sets-four-week-deadline-to-decide-aiims-nursing-officers-plea-to-protect-her-military-053b4eeea9324558af59ce0b3cdbf0c4.webp)